On the issue of the meaning of the term linguo-local studies
https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-1-61-72
Abstract
We devote to the study of the functioning features of the term linguo-local studies in the modern Russian literary language. The relevance of linguo-local studies in modern linguistics, the active inclusion of linguo-local studies material in the teaching of the Russian language in educational institutions and universities contribute to the widespread use of the lexeme linguo-local studies. The purpose of work is to study lexicographic sources from the point of view of representation of the term linguo-local studies in them and to clarify its meaning in modern scientific discourse, taking into account the changed realities of the use of lexeme. Based on the analysis of reference literature, we conclude that a significant part of modern linguistic dictionaries does not fix the term linguo-local studies, despite its active use in scientific research, theory and methodology of teaching the Russian language and Russian as a foreign language. Due to the features of the functioning of lexeme linguo-local studies at the present time and on the basis of a comparative analysis of the definitions of terms that name related disciplines, assumptions are made regarding the clarification of the meaning of the term linguo-local studies.
About the Author
L. N. Verkhovykh
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lуudmila N. Verkhovykh, Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines Department, Borisoglebsk Branch of Voronezh State University
1 Universitetskaya Sq., Voronezh 394018
References
1. Klimkova L.A. Lingvokrayevedeniye: ob”yem, soderzhaniye, znachimost’ [Linguo-local studies: volume, content, significance]. Russkoye slovo i kostromskoy kray [Russian Word and Kostroma Region]. St. Peters-burg, Nestor-History Publ., 2013, pp. 457-465. (In Russian).
2. Klimkova L.A. Lingvokrayevedeniye v otechestvennom nauchnom i obrazovatel’nom prostranstve [Linguistic area study in national scientific and educational system]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vestnik of Kostromf State University, 2017, vol. 23, Special issue, pp. 92-96. (In Russian).
3. Kovalev G.F. Lingvokrayevedeniye v sredney shkole kak sredstvo vospitaniya patriotov rodnogo kraya [Linguo-local studies in secondary school as a means of educating patriots of the native land]. Kul’tura v sisteme obshchestvennogo vospitaniya: prikladnyye problemy [Culture in the System of Public Education: Applied Problems]. Voronezh, 1998, bk 1, pp. 127-132. (In Russian).
4. Kovalev G.F. Izbrannoye. Etnonimika. Voronezhskoye lingvokrayevedeniye. Raznoye [Favorites. Ethnonymy. Voronezh Regional Linguistics. Miscellanea]. Voronezh, Publishing and Printing Center “Scientific Book”, 2014, 440 p. (In Russian).
5. Shcherbak A.S. Lingvokrayevedeniye: ucheb.-metod. posobiye dlya bakalavrov i magistrantov po napravleniyu «Filologiya», profil’ «Otechestvennaya filologiya (russkiy yazyk i literatura)» i dlya inostrannykh studentov-filologov [Linguo-local studies: Educational and Methodical Manual for Bachelors and Undergraduates in the Direction of “Philology”, Profile “Domestic Philology (Russian Language and Literature)” and for Foreign Students of Philology]. Tambov, Derzhavin Tambov State University Publishing House, 2011, 64 p. (In Russian).
6. Shcherbak A.S. Onomastika i krayevedeniye [Onomastics and linguo-local studies]. Teoriya i praktika onomasticheskikh i derivatologicheskikh issledovaniy [Theory and Practice of Onomastic and Dermatological Research]. Maykop, Magarin O.G. Publ., 2017, pp. 183-200. (In Russian).
7. Mayorova T.V. Lingvisticheskoye krayevedeniye i ego rol’ v formirovanii lichnostnykh kachestv podrostka [Linguistic Local Studies and Its Role in the Formation of Personal Qualities of a Teenager]. Tula, Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University Publ., 2007, 285 p. (In Russian).
8. Shumarina M.R. Lingvisticheskoye krayevedeniye. Metodicheskiye ukazaniya k kursu [Linguistic Local Studies. Methodological Instructions for the Course]. Saratov, 2011, 30 p. (In Russian).
9. Verkhovykh L.N. Lingvokrayevedeniye v shkole [Linguo-Local Studies at School]. Voronezh, Voronezh State Pedagogical University Publ., 2017, 255 p. (In Russian).
10. Verkhovykh L.N. Lingvokrayevedcheskaya rabota na urokakh russkogo yazyka i russkogo rodnogo yazyka kak sposob aktivizatsii poznavatel’noy deyatel’nosti obuchayushchikhsya [Linguocultural work on the lessons Russian and Russian as a native language as a means to promote learners’ cognitive activity]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole – Russian Language at School, 2021, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 21-30. (In Russian).
11. Suprun V.I. Krayevedcheskaya onomastika [Local study onomastics]. Tezisy dokladov Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Dukhovnaya kul’tura: problemy i tendentsii razvitiya. Lingvisticheskoye izucheniye material’noy i dukhovnoy kul’tury» [Abstracts of the All-Russian Scientific Conference “Spiritual Culture: Problems and Trends in Development. Linguo-Local Study of Material and Spiritual Culture”]. Syktyvkar, 1994, pp. 142-144. (In Russian).
12. Novikova T.F. Lingvoregionovedeniye. Ch. 1: programma i programmno-metodicheskie materialy [Linguo-Local Studies. Pt 1: Program and Program Materials]. Belgorod, BelSU Publ., 2010, 76 p. (In Russian).
13. Gordova Y.Y. Lingvisticheskiye problemy regional’noy onomastiki v istoricheskoy perspektive (na materiale ryazanskoy toponimii i antroponimii): avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.21 – prikladnaya i matematicheskaya lingvistika [Linguistic Problems of Regional Onomastics in a Historical Perspective (on the Material of Ryazan Toponymy and Anthroponymy). Dr. philol. sci. diss. abstr.: 10.02.21 – Applied and Mathematical Linguistics]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2018, 46 p. (In Russian).
14. Klimkova L.A. Nizhegorodskaya mikrotoponimiya v yazykovoy kartine mire [Nizhny Novgorod Microtoponymy in the Language Picture of the World]. Moscow, Moscow Pedagogical State University; Arzamas, Arzamas Branch of Lobachevsky University Publ., 2007, 394 p. (In Russian).
15. Kyurshchnova I.A. Istoricheskaya antroponimiya Karelii v novykh paradigmakh lingvisticheskogo znaniya: dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.01 – russkiy yazyk [Historical Anthroponymy of Karelia in New Paradigms of Linguistic Knowledge. Dr. philol. sci. diss.: 10.02.01 – Russian Language]. Petrozavodsk, 2017, 643 p. (In Russian).
16. Polyakova E.N. Regional’naya leksikologiya i onomastika [Regional Lexicology and Onomastics]. Perm, Perm State University Publ., 2006, 256 p. (In Russian).
17. Popov S.A. Oykonimiya Voronezhskoy oblasti v sisteme lingvokrayevedcheskikh distsiplin [Oikonymy of the Voronezh Region in the System of Local Linguistic Disciplines]. Voronezh, Aleynikovy Publishing House, 2003, 285 p.
18. Shcherbak A.S. Problemy izucheniya regional’noy onomastiki. Onomastikon Tambovskoy oblasti [Problems of Studying Regional Onomastics. Onomasticon of the Tambov Region]. Tambov, Derzhavin Tambov State University Publ., 2006, 293 p.
19. Shmidt S.O. Vstupitel’noye slovo na Pervom Vserossiyskom s”yezde istorikov-regionovedov v Sankt-Peterburge (11–14 sentyabrya 2007) [Opening speech at the first All-Russian congress of regional historians in Saint-Petersburg (11-14 September 2007)]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Istoricheskiye nauki. Regional’naya istoriya. Krayevedeniye – RGGU Bulletin. Series: Historical Sciences. Regional and Local History, Mos-cow, 2012, no. 6 (86), pp. 15-24. (In Russian).
20. Gromov M.N. Teoreticheskiye printsipy strukturirovaniya rossiyskogo krayevedeniya [Theoretical principles of structuring of Russian local studies]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Istoricheskiye nauki. Regional’naya istoriya. Krayevedeniye – RGGU Bulletin. Series: Historical Sciences. Regional and Local History, Mos-cow, 2012, no. 6 (86), pp. 25-33. (In Russian).
21. Likhachev D.S. Krayevedeniye kak nauka i deyatel’nost’ [Local study as a science and activity]. Russkaya kul’tura [Russian Culture]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 2000, pp. 159-173. (In Russian).
22. Verkhovykh L.N. Aktual’nyye voprosy metodiki prepodavaniya russkogo rodnogo yazyka [Current issues of teaching methods of Russian native language]. Neofilologiya – Neophilology, 2021, vol. 7, no. 28, pp. 618-625. https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-28-618-625. (In Russian).
23. Brysina E.V., Suprun V.I. Prepodavaniye russkogo yazyka v usloviyakh yuzhnorusskogo dialekta [Teaching the Russian language in the conditions of the South Russian dialect]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole – Russian Language at School, 2017, no. 6, pp. 27-31. (In Russian).
24. Kazankova A.A. Izucheniye lingvokrayevedcheskogo materiala v shkole [The study of linguistic and local history material at school]. Materialy 14 Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Onomastika Povolzh’ya» [Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific Conference “Onomastics of the Volga Region”]. Tver, Marina Batasova Publ., Alfa-Press Publ., 2014, pp. 342-344. (In Russian).
25. Karaseva T.V. Spetskurs «Voronezhskoye lingvokrayevedeniye» na filologicheskom fakul’tete VGU [Special course “Voronezh linguo-local studies” at the Faculty of Philology of the Voronezh State University]. Materialy 2 Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii «Rodnoy yazyk: problemy teorii i praktiki prepodavaniya» [Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Methodological Conference “Native Language: Problems of Theory and Practice of Teaching”]. Borisoglebsk, 2009, pp.158-160. (In Russian).
26. Klimkova L.A. Dialektologo-onomasticheskaya rabota v vuze i shkole [Dialectological and Onomastic Work at the University and School]. Arzamas, 1988, 91 p. (In Russian).
27. Kovalev G.F. Izucheniye onomastiki v shkole kak mezhpredmetnaya integratsiya na urokakh russkoy slovesnosti [The study of onomastics at school as an interdisciplinary integration in the lessons of Russian literature]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole – Russian Language at School, 2017, no. 12, pp. 22-28. (In Russian).
28. Kovalev G.F. Slovar’ mikrotoponimov Voronezhskoy oblasti: v 2 t. [Dictionary of Microtoponyms of the Voronezh Region: in 2 vols.]. Voronezh, Nauka-Unipress Publ., 2017, vol. 1, 410 p.; vol. 2, 420 p. (In Russian).
29. Kovalev G.F. Onomasticheskiye issledovaniya i izucheniye rodnogo kraya [Onomastic research and study of the native land]. Voronezhskoye lingvokrayevedeniye. Vyp. 1 [Voronezh Linguo-Local Studies. Issue 1]. Voronezh, Voronezh State University Publ., 2005, pp. 3-23. (In Russian).
30. Anokhina L.I., Abreimova G.N., Borisova N.V. et al. (auth.-compilers). Lingvisticheskoye otechestvovedeniye: v 2 t. [Linguistic Homeland Studies: in 2 vols.]. Elets, Yelets State University named after I.A. Bunin Publ., 2001, vol. 1, 275 p.; vol. 2. 239 p. (In Russian).
31. Piskunova S.V. (executive ed.), Popovicheva I.V., Shcherbak A.S., Moiseyeva L.S., Ivanova M.I., Gubareva V.V., Makhracheva T.V. (auth.-compilers). Lingvokrayevedeniye [Linguo-Local Studies]. Tambov, 2005, 187 p. (In Russian).
32. Lyzhova L.K. Regional’nyy komponent v prepodavanii russkogo yazyka [Regional component in the teaching of the Russian language]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole – Russian Language at School, 1994, no. 1, pp. 11-14. (In Russian).
33. Moiseyev A.P. Toponimicheskoye krayevedeniye. Chelyabinskaya oblast’: (lingvisticheskoye) [Toponymic Local History. Chelyabinsk Region: (Linguistic)]. Chelyabinsk, Abris Publ., 2013, 156 p. (In Russian).
34. Ogdonova T.T. Lingvisticheskoye krayevedeniye [Linguistic Local Studies]. Irkutsk, Asprint Publ., 2016, 170 p. (In Russian).
35. Popov S.A., Pukhova T.F., Griboyedova E.A. Toponimiya Voronezhskogo kraya [Toponymy of the Voronezh Territory]. Voronezh, Center for Spiritual Revival of the Chernozem Territory Publ., 2018, 336 p. (In Russian).
36. Filatova V.F. Kurs krayevedeniya kak vozmozhnost’ realizatsii variativnoy chasti OOP v svete trebovaniy FGOS: lingvisticheskoye krayevedeniye [The course of local history as an opportunity to implement the variable part of the OOP in the light of the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard: linguistic local history]. Pedagogicheskoye regionovedeniye. Nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal [Pedagogical Regional Studies. Scientific and Methodical Journal], 2016, no. 2 (10), pp. 5-20. (In Russian).
37. Filatova V.F. Lingvisticheskoye krayevedeniye: Programma kursa. Spetsial’nost’ 032900 – Literaturnoye i lingvisticheskoye krayevedeniye [Linguistic Local Study: Course Program. Specialty 032900 – Literary and Linguistic Local Study]. Borisoglebsk, Borisoglebsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2002, 19 p. (In Russian).
38. Shenkman V.I. Russkaya rech’ Prikam’ya: Lingvisticheskoye krayevedeniye [Russian Speech of the Kama Region: Linguistic Local Study]. Perm, Knizhny Mir Publ., 2004, 15 p. (In Russian).
39. Koroleva I.A. Regional’naya toponimiya: obshchnost’ toponimicheskoy sistemy smolensko-vitebskogo prigranich’ya [Regional toponymy: toponymic system commonality of the Smolensk-Vitebsk borderland]. Neofilologiya – Neophilology, 2021, vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 425-433. https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-27-425-433. (In Russian).
40. Brysina E.V., Suprun V.I. Stranovedcheskiy potentsial donskoy kazach’yey kul’tury i dialekta [Areal studies potential of the Don Cossack culture and dialect]. Mir russkogo slova – The World of Russian Word, 2021, no. 3, pp. 4-13. https://doi.org/10.24412/1811-1629-2021-3-4-13. (In Russian).
41. Neganova G.D. Nazvaniya berega i form beregovogo rel’yefa v govorakh Kostromskoy oblasti: landshaftno-geograficheskiy aspect [The names of the coast and forms of coastal relief in the Kostroma Region’s patois: landscape and geographical aspect]. Neofilologiya – Neophilology, 2021, vol. 7, no. 26, pp. 227-234. https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-26-227-234. (In Russian).
42. Popov S.A. Geroicheskiye memorativy v rossiyskom toponimikone [Heroic memoratives in the Russian toponymicon]. Neofilologiya – Neophilology, 2021, vol. 7, no. 28, pp. 596-604. https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-28-596-604. (In Russian).
43. Nash J. Official and Unofficial Toponyms on Norfolk Island. Voprosy onomastiki – Problems of Onomastics, 2021, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 228-236. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2021.18.2.027. (In English).
44. Schaarschmidt G. Some Good Reasons for Renaming Places, and Some not so Good Ones: a Cross-Cultural Sketch. In Honour of Canada̕s 150th Birthday and the Year of Reconciliation. Voprosy onomastiki – Problems of Onomastics, 2018, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 181-187. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2018.15.1.009. (In English).
Review
For citations:
Verkhovykh L.N. On the issue of the meaning of the term linguo-local studies. Neophilology. 2022;8(1):61-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-1-61-72
Views:
75
Email this article 