Aesthetic image of Turkic paremic unit
https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-1-163-168
Abstract
The work is devoted to understanding the aesthetic assessment on the basis of Turkic proverbs and sayings. We consider linguo-philosophical judgments about beauty, which are included in the content of proverbs and sayings in the modern Kazakh language. We establish that proverbs and sayings, being complex linguistic units, express a holistic conceptual thought. They occupy a special place among the topical problems of Turkic linguistics. It is established that Turkic proverbs and sayings reflect an indicator of aesthetic taste, the desire to know themselves, the environment and form a base of practical knowledge that determines the spiritual values of each member of the ethnic group, differentiating being from the point of view of aesthetic values, which include the best qualities and important life attitudes. in cognition, the culture of the ethnic group.
Keywords
Turkic paremiology,
linguo-philosophical approach,
semantics,
aesthetic values,
Kipchak group languages,
language representation
Supporting agencies: The research is made within the framework of the project “Paremological revival of spiritual values: applied aspects of the study of Turkic proverbs and sayings”, AR 08856427, funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2020–2021).
About the Authors
M. K. Eskeyeva
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Magripa K. Eskeyeva, Doctor of Philology, Professor of Turkic Studies Department
ScopusAuthor ID: 57192307825
11 Kazhymukana St., Nur-Sultan 010008
U. A. Mussabekova
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Urzada A. Mussabekova, Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor of Turkic Studies Department
Scopus Author ID: 57216239528
11 Kazhymukana St., Nur-Sultan 010008
References
1. Abakumova O.B. Emotsii v poslovitsakh o lyubvi [Emotions in proverbs about love]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Emotsional’naya sfera cheloveka v yazyke i kommunikatsii: sinkhroniya i diakhroniya» [Proceedings of the International Conference “The Emotional Sphere of Man in Language and Communication: Synchrony and Diachrony”]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2020, pp. 7-12. (In Russian).
2. Temirgazina Z.K. Sovremennyye teorii v otechestvennoy i zarubezhnoy lingvistike [Modern Theories in Domestic and Foreign Linguistics]. Pavlodar, Pavlodar Pedagogical Institute Publ., 2009, 134 p. (In Russian).
3. Shakhovskiy V.I. Ekologiya yazyka i cheloveka v menyayushchemsya sotsiume [Language and human ecology in the changing society]. Neofilologiya – Neophilology, 2020, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 217-225. https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2020-6-22-217-225. (In Russian).
4. Shakhovskiy V.I. Triada ekologiy – chelovek, yazyk, emotsii – v sovremennoy kommunikativnoy praktike [The Triad of Ecologies – Man, Language, Emotions – in Modern Communicative Practice]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2017, 359 p. (In Russian).
5. Eskeyeva M.K. Lingvofilosofskiye osnovy drevnetyurkskogo pis’mennogo naslediya [Linguo-Philosophical Foundations of the Ancient Turkic Written Heritage]. Astana, Saryarqa Publ., 2011, 320 p. (In Russian).
6. Ivanov G.I. (translation). Turetskiye poslovitsy i pogovorki [Turkish Proverbs and Sayings]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966, 39 p. (In Russian).
7. Sigal K.Y. Ustoychivaya fraza kak aksiologicheskiy znak [Fixed phrase as an axiological sign]. Kognitivnyye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive Studies of Language]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics Publ.; Tambov, Publishing House “Derzhavinsky”, 2021, no. 2 (45), pp. 675-685. (In Russian).
8. Galimullina R.I. Interpretatsiya paremii s komponentom-zoonim v tatarskom yazyke [Interpretation of proverbs with a zoonym component in the Tatar language]. Sbornik Mezhdunarodnoy tyurkologicheskoy konferentsii «Aktual’nyye problemy tyurkologii: Rossiya i tyurko-musul’manskiy mir» [Collection of the International Turkological Conference “Actual Problems of Turkic Studies: Russia and the Turkic-Muslim World”]. Yelabuga, 2020, pp. 17-18. (In Russian).
9. Katsyuba L.B. Opredeleniye paremii (lingvisticheskiy aspekt definitsii) [Definition of proverbs (linguistic aspect)]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Lingvistika – Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics, 2013, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 65-67. (In Russian).
10. Dybo A.V. Use of personal markers in the Beltyr dialect of the Khakas lan-guage from a comparative perspective. Turkic Languages, 2019, no. 23, pp. 31-48.
Review
For citations:
Eskeyeva M.K., Mussabekova U.A. Aesthetic image of Turkic paremic unit. Neophilology. 2022;8(1):163-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-1-163-168
Views:
42
Email this article 