The mechanism of “perspectivization” in understanding of educational text
https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-26-241-247
Abstract
We consider the educational text as a cognitive fund of scientific achievements, which is explicated in the communicative field of “educational discourse”, which predetermines its differential features that distinguish it from other texts by formal and substantive criteria. We prove that the educational text indicates not only what is really present in it, but also what is subject to semantic inference. Based on the educational text, students make inferences, which is facilitated by the cognitive mechanism “perspectivization”. We establish that this is one of the main cognitive mechanisms that can serve to form the projection of educational discourse in the individual mind. From the standpoint of the relationship of cognitive (educational), communicative, linguistic criteria, we prove that it is the mechanism of “perspectivization” that presupposes the advancement of such a text sign as a title, represented by words or phrases correlated with words in the direct meaning. The title of the educational text reflects the information of the conceptual structure of the entire educational text and dictated by the need for the process of understanding the educational text and comprehending the various metatext created on the basis of educational texts. We make the assumption that the units of the educational text act as a means of representing other conceptual areas, since the educational text reflects the semantic function of the language.
About the Authors
A. A. Rubas
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Alyona A. Rubas, PhD 8D02305 – “Philology” (Specialization: Language Studies), Theoretical and Applied Linguistics Department
11 Kazhymukana St., Nur-Sultan 010008
A. S. Shcherbak
Derzhavin Tambov State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Antonina S. Shcherbak, Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of Russian Language Department
33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000
A. E. Agmanova
L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Atirkul E. Agmanova, Doctor of Philology, Professor of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics Department
11 Kazhymukana St., Nur-Sultan 010008
References
1. Zborovskiy G.E. Obrazovatel’naya neuspeshnost’ uchashchikhsya i studentov kak problema nauki i praktiki [Educational failure of students as a problem of science and practice]. Vestnik SurGPU – The Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2020, no. 2 (65), pp. 9-20. (In Russian).
2. Pavilenis R.I. Problema smysla: sovremennyy logiko-filosofskiy analiz yazyka [The Problem of Meaning: Modern Logical-Philosophical Analysis of Language]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1983, 286 p. (In Russian).
3. Shakhovskiy V.I. Sovpadeniye smyslovykh pazlov kak usloviye effektivnosti sovremennoy kommunikatsii [Coincidence of sense puzzles as a condition for effective contemporary communication]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika – Bulletin of The Msru. Series: Linguistics, 2020, no. 3, pp. 34-52. (In Russian).
4. Romanova T.V. Kognitivnyy analiz teksta: rabota nad metodologicheskimi oshibkami [Cognitive analysis of the text: work on methodological mistakes]. Teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye aspekty izucheniya rechevoy deyatel’nosti – Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Studying Speech Activity, 2013, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 170181. (In Russian).
5. Sunnatova R.I., Fomichenko A.S. Vzaimootnosheniya v sisteme «uchitel’ – uchenik» kak usloviye uspeshnosti uchebnoy deyatel’nosti shkol’nikov [Relationships in the “teacher – student” system as a condition for the success of the educational activities of schoolchildren]. Psikhologicheskiye nauki i obrazovaniye [Psychological Sciences and Education], 2017, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 39-47. (In Russian).
6. Schaeffer B. Linguistic Function and Language Intervention. II. Special Topics. The Journal of Special Education, 2001, vol. 4, pp. 401-411.
7. Fillmor C. Freymy i semantika ponimaniya [Frames and semantics of understanding]. Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. 23. Kognitivnyye aspekty yazyka [New in Foreign Linguistics. Issue 23. Cognitive Aspects of Language]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, pp. 52-92. (In Russian).
8. Temirgazina Z.K. Lingvisticheskaya aksiologiya: Otsenochnyye vyskazyvaniya v russkom yazyke [Linguistic Axiology: Valuative Utterances in Russian]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2015, 247 p. (In Russian).
9. Abildinova Z.B. Yazykovoe soznanie kak psikholingvisticheskiy fenomen [Linguistic consciousness as a psycholinguistic phenomenon]. Neofilologiya – Neophilology, 2018, vol. 4, no. 14, pp. 33-43. (In Russian). DOI 10.20310/2587-6953-2018-4-14-33-43
10. Croft W., Cruse A. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 356 p.
11. Bobyleva M. My tak govorim. Obidnyye slova i kak ikh izbezhat’ [That’s What We Say. Offensive Words and How to Avoid Them]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2021, 224 p. (In Russian).
12. Shcherbak A.S. Onomasticheskoye soznaniye kak kognitivno-yazykovaya sistema [Onomastic consciousness as a cognitive-language system]. Kognitivnyye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive Studies of Language]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics RAS; Tambov, Publishing House of Derzhavin Tambov State University, 2020, pp. 301-304. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Rubas A.A., Shcherbak A.S., Agmanova A.E. The mechanism of “perspectivization” in understanding of educational text. Neophilology. 2021;7(26):241-247. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-26-241-247
Views:
45
Email this article 