Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

Contemporary poetry book reviews: quantitative analysis

https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-26-276-288

Abstract

The work displays progress and results of the quantitative study of poetry book reviews published in the Russian-language literary periodicals in recent years (2014–2019). We describe the method of material selection (chronological framework, range of sources – literary and philological journals, newspapers, – criteria for selection of literary-critical texts), the method of calculating the volume of material. We give the main quantitative characteristics of the received corpus: total number and total volume of texts, average annual number and volume, average volume of one review (calculated both for the entire array and separately for review-digest – bibliographic leaflets), number of reviewers, number of sources. All sources, which are 46 literary publications, are divided into three groups, depending on the published volume of reviews. The work contains a brief description of these publications in connection with the review activity: the presence and features of literary-critical strategy, rubrication, etc. The appendices to the work provide detailed quantitative data. The research collects a significant corpus of texts (more than 400 a. s.) describing and analyzing contemporary Russian poetry. The quantitative data obtained for the first time helps to form a relevant scientific picture of “who makes Russian literature today”.

About the Author

E. V. Novozhilova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Elena V. Novozhilova, Competitor, Philology and History Institute

6 Miusskaya Sq., GSP-3, Moscow 125993



References

1. Dashevskiy G. «Pora idti»? [“It’s time to go”?]. Kriticheskaya massa [Critical Mass], 2004, no. 2. (In Russian). Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/km/2004/2/pora-idti.html (accessed 25.11.2020).

2. Ganin M. Bez gneva i pristrastiya [Without anger and addiction]. OpenSpace.ru, 2010, 9 March. (In Russian). Available at: http://os.colta.ru/literature/events/details/16616 (accessed 25.11.2020).

3. Kozlov V. Nich’ya zemlya sovremennoy poezii [Nobody’s land of modern poetry]. Voprosy literatury – Issues of Literature, 2018, no. 5, pp. 103-125. (In Russian).

4. Vezhlyan E. Kritika: «smert’» ili «promezhutok»? [Criticism: “death” or “gap”?]. Literratura, 2018, no. 122. (In Russian). Available at: http://literratura.org/criticism/2893-evgeniya-vezhlyan-kritika-smert-ilipromezhutok.html (accessed 25.11.2020).

5. Shapir M.I. «Tebe chisla i mery net». O vozmozhnostyakh i granitsakh «tochnykh metodov» v gumanitarnykh naukakh [“You have no number and no measure”. On the possibilities and limits of “exact methods” in the humanities]. In: Yarkho B.I. Metodologiya tochnogo literaturovedeniya: Izbrannyye trudy po teorii literatury [Methodology of Exact Literary Studies: Selected Works on the Theory of Literature]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Cultures Publ., 2006, pp. 875-905. (In Russian).

6. Novozhilova E.V. Individualizatsiya v retsenzii na poyeticheskuyu knigu [Individualization in poetic book review]. Neofilologiya – Neophilology, 2019, vol. 5, no. 19, pp. 357-363. (In Russian). DOI 10.20310/25876953-2019-5-19-357-363


Review

For citations:


Novozhilova E.V. Contemporary poetry book reviews: quantitative analysis. Neophilology. 2021;7(26):276-288. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-26-276-288

Views: 55


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)