Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

Zootropes in V.I. Dal

https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2024-10-3-554-567

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The article examines human nominations formed using animal names (zootropes) included by V.I. Dal in the “Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language”. This aspect of the analysis of the work, unique in its composition and volume of vocabulary, has not previously been the subject of research. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that Dal’s dictionary presents a real, living language used in a vast territory of Russia. The purpose of the study is an analytical description of the animal names used to designate and characterize, evaluate a person in Dal’s dictionary (19th century), as well as identifying nominations preserved in the modern language, according to the lexicography of the 21st century.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research material is zootropes contained in the “Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language” by V.I. Dal: in the heading of the article, in the text and illustrations, as well as the latest version of the “Large Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language” of 2014. Semantic, comparative, word-formation and pragmatic methods were used.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. About 90 units naming animals (beasts, birds, fish, insects, snakes and reptiles) were identified, which native speakers in the 19th century used to designate humans. 80 % of them are included in the corpus of zootropes of the modern Russian language and are recorded in modern lexicography of the 21st century. As the analysis shows, the names of animals are used to characterize a person’s appearance, internal qualities and behavior, to express a positive, sharp negative assessment and abuse.

CONCLUSION. Zootropes of the modern Russian language constitute a significant layer of vocabulary that has absorbed traditional Russian ideas about their values. The most important condemned human qualities that are designated with the help of zootropes in the 19th and 21st centuries are greed, anger, untidiness and sloppiness, immodesty, and uncommunicativeness.

About the Author

Z. I. Mineeva
Petrozavodsk State University
Russian Federation

Zoya I. Mineeva, Dr. Sci. (Philology), Associate Professor, Professor of Russian Language Department

33 Lenin Ave., Petrozavodsk, 185910, Russian Federation 



References

1. Apresjan V.Yu., Apresyan Yu.D., Dragoy O.V., Yomdin B.L., Laurinavichyute A.K., Levontina I.B., Lopukhin K.A., Lopukhina A.A., Uryson E.V. A multifaceted approach to semantic, statistical, and psycholinguistic analysis of lexical polysemy. Russkaya rech’ = Russian Speech, 2019, no. 1, pp. 8-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013161170003937-9, https://elibrary.ru/orfvga

2. Chudinov A.P., Shustrova E.V. Modern metaphor research in Russia: trends, schools and results. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2024, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 190-209. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-35070, https://elibrary.ru/oktfhp

3. Fatkullina F.G., Lin Z. Zoometaphora as a component of the world picture. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya = The world of science, culture and education, Education, 2020, no. 1 (80), pp. 449-451. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/1991-5497-2020-00179, https://elibrary.ru/rrdzyk

4. Dorogaikina E.M., Ignatieva T.G. Zoological names as object of linguistic research. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya lingvistika = Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 2019, vol. 5, no. 3. pp. 53-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22250/2410-7190_2019_5_3_53_66, https://elibrary.ru/cdjetn

5. Bogdanova L.I. Man as reflected in the zoomorphic metaphor. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19: lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya = Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2023, no. 2, pp. 24-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-2023-2-01-02, https://elibrary.ru/gqjrcr

6. Sharova A.A. Linguo-cultural and gender analysis of zoomorphisms in the Russian and English languages. Verkhnevolzhskii filologicheskii vestnik = Verhnevolzhski philological bulletin, 2023, no. 1, pp. 112-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20323/2499_9679_2023_1_32_112, https://elibrary.ru/svwydb

7. Mikhaylova Yu.N., Zhao I. Cultural connotations of zoonyms in Russian and chinese idioms. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnye nauki = Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2. Humanities and Arts, 2016, vol. 18, no. 4 (157), pp. 168-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/izv2.2016.18.4.073, https://elibrary.ru/xhpzxv

8. Mineeva Z.I. The polysemy of Russian zootropes. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2014, no. 3, pp. 328-338. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/snubjn

9. Mineeva Z.I. New human designations based on bird names. In: Bird as an image, symbol, concept in literature, culture and language: Moscow, 2019, pp. 327-336. https://elibrary.ru/rlmzkb

10. Mineeva Z.I. Pragmatic potential of zootropes in works by Alexander Pushkin. Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University, 2021, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 22-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz.art.2021.564, https://elibrary.ru/vcjlwt

11. Kovshova M.L. The Analysis of Idioms, Riddles and Proverbs from the Perspective of Language and Culture Studies. Anthropomonical Culture Code. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2022, 396 p. (In Russ.)

12. https://elibrary.ru/bkrgsm

13. Petrova Z.Yu., Fateeva N.A. A System of Similes and Metaphors in O. Slavnikova’s Novel “2017”. Russkaya Rech’ = Russian Speech, 2023, no. 6, pp. 95-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013161170028372-8

14. Sharandin A.L. “Explanatory dictionary of the living great Russian language” by V.I. Dahl and modern lexicography. Philological Regional Science, 2011, no. 2 (6), pp. 53-58. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tlqwth

15. Kozhevnikova N.A., Petrova Z.Yu. Materialy k slovaryu metafor i sravnenii russkoi literatury XIX–XX vv. Tom. 2. Zveri, nasekomye, ryby, zmei. Moscow, LRC Publ., 2010, 512 p. https://elibrary.ru/pxwfvn

16. Vendina T.I. Arealogical analysis of the “Slavic Linguistic Atlas” lexicon (Vol. 1 “Animal World”). Trudy Instituta russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova = Proceedings of the V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 2023, no. 3, pp. 9-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31912/pvrli-2023.3.1, https://elibrary.ru/tvnwpa

17. Mamedov A.A. Zoomorphic tropes as reflection of S. Yesenin’s and N. Klyuev’s metaphoric world image. Trudy Instituta russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova = Proceedings of the V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 2023, no. 2, pp. 244-250. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31912/pvrli-2023.2.23, https://elibrary.ru/jlgxdc

18. Frolova O.E. Аigurative meanings of animal names in explanatory dictionaries (anthropocentric aspect). Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii = Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2005, no. 2 (10), pp. 137-158. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hyzslj


Review

For citations:


Mineeva Z.I. Zootropes in V.I. Dal. Neophilology. 2024;10(3):554-567. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2024-10-3-554-567

Views: 108


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)