Functional-semantic type of substantive word adverbialization form “boon”

The study relevance is due to the need for a comprehensive interdisciplinary mechanism analysis of transposition in the language, which generates a huge layer of grammatical and lexicalgrammatical homonyms, as well as syncretic (peripheral and hybrid) structures that allow economically, but capaciously expressing thoughts and feelings of a person. While studying the steps of adverbial transposition substantive word forms, the patterns of interaction between semantic and grammatical in the formations structure explicating in typical contexts the core and periphery nouns zones and the peripheral and nuclear substantive adverbs formed on their basis were revealed. On the example of the word form “boon”, different degrees of its departure from the nouns class and approaching the adverbs class are demonstrated. As a applying result the methodology of oppositional analysis and indexing, it has been established that in the zone of the adverbs core it finds, on the one hand, 0 % of the correspondence of its differential features to the original nuclear noun “boon” features, and on the other hand, 80 % of the correspondence to the differential substantive nuclear adverb “circle” features. The idea is substantiated that 100 % correspondence of the properties of different prototypical adverbs in the structure of any nuclear adverb is unlikely due to individual semantic and syntactic differences of adverbial lexemes, including their accentological features. The study results can be used in further developments on the problem of transposition and syncretism in the system of parts of speech and interpartial semantic-syntactic categories. 

1. Vorotnikov Yu.L. Slovo i vremya [Word and Time]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2003, 165 p. (In Russ.)

2. Kustova G.I. Mental’nye predikaty v metatekstovykh konstruktsiyakh 2-go litsa [Mental predicates in metatextual constructions of the 2nd person]. Po materialam ezhegodnoi mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii «Dialog» «Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii» [Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue” “Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies”]. Moscow, 2018, issue 17 (24), pp. 380-390. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xzpzxf

3. Paducheva E.V. Egotsentricheskie edinitsy yazyka [Egocentric Units of Language]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Сultures Publishing House, 2019, 439 p. (In Russ.)

4. Shigurov V.V. “Judge by” in the context of modalation and prospositionalization: on indices of transposition. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya literatury i yazyka = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language, 2020, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 42-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S241377150013063-2, https://elibrary.ru/gsxges

5. Galkina-Fedoruk E.M. Narechie v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Adverb in Modern Russian Language]. Moscow, Moscow Institute of History, Philosophy and Literature Publ., 1939, 156 p. (In Russ.)

6. Pankov F.I. Polifunktsional’nost’ leksicheskikh edinits v ustnoi rechi (na materiale slova «eshche») [Polyfunctionality of lexical units in oral speech (on the material of the word “more”)]. Materialy 5 kongressa ROPRYaL «Dinamika yazykovykh i kul’turnykh protsessov v sovremennoi Rossii» [Proceedings of the 5th Congress of Russian Society of Teachers of Russian Language and Literature “Dynamics of linguistic and Cultural Processes in Modern Russia”], 2016, no. 5, pp. 434-439. (In Russ.) Available at: https://istina.msu.ru/download/30186145/1fWpTA:pkS6d8m6P-4ETrdSGJHnR-WH3PY/

7. Norman B.Yu. Zhizn’ slovoformy [Word Form Life]. Moscow, FLINTA-M Publ., 2016, 213 p. (In Russ.)

8. Tsimmerling A.V. Ot integral’nogo k aspektivnomu [From Integral to Aspective]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, 2021, 652 p. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.31754/nestor4469-1792-1, https://elibrary.ru/gfhgff