Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

The hyphen as a non-traditional sign of orthography

https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2019-5-17-42-48

Abstract

In this study we consider such a nonalphabetical sign of Russian orthography, as the hyphen, which was field of increased focus of the famous Kazakh scientist N.I. Gainullina. Attention is drawn to the fact that in the written works of today’s bachelor’s, master’s degree student and even postgraduate students are confused three characters: a dash as a punctuation mark, a hyphen as a sign of orthography and em dash, or “long dash”, which appeared as a result of the development of information technology and computer-network topics, the so-called “Internet” “long dash”. Based on the material of examples of writing Russian toponyms found that among the currently existing recommendations on the use of hyphen and contained in the current, known to all Russian speakers set of orthographic rules, there is no clear notation that would provide for its use for the division of complex toponyms; we highlight the reasons for the unresolved spelling of complex toponyms. It has been established that the “expressive purposes” of the hyphen usage, the statement of which contradicts the traditional spelling of the word, and it is proved that the use of the hyphen in various texts should be considered as a manifestation of the individual author’s handwriting features, when the main goal of the author of the text is achieved-to convey the proposed subtleties of the meaning of words and the elegance of the formula of self - expression.

About the Author

Antonina S. Shcherbak
Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin; Binhai Institute of Foreign Affairs, Political Science and Law of Tianjin Foreign Studies University
Russian Federation


References

1. Гайнуллина Н.И. Дефис с позиций экологии языка // Экология языка и речи: материалы Междунар. науч. конф. / отв. ред. А.С. Щербак. Тамбов: Изд. дом ТГУ им. Г.Р. Державина, 2012. С. 41-45.

2. Толковый словарь русского языка. С включением сведений о происхождении слов / отв. ред. Н.Ю. Шведова. М., 2008. 1175 с.

3. Гайнуллина Н.И. Заимствованная лексика в Петровскую эпоху: процессы адаптации. Алматы: Қазақ университетi, 2008. 295 с.

4. Гайнуллина Н.И. О смешанном характере русского языка и норме переходного периода // Вестник КазНУ. Серия филологическая. 2004. № 2 (74). С. 4-7.

5. Козлов С. Ясность речи. URL: http://np.kz/people/ 2598-jasnost_rechi.html (дата обращения: 13.12.2018).

6. Валгина Н.С., Светлышева В.Н. Справочник по орфографии и пунктуации. М.: Высш. шк., 1993. 335 с.

7. Щербак А.С. Рекомендации по правописанию урбанонимов при реализации законов о наименовании и переименовании адресных линейных объектов Российской Федерации. Тамбов: ООО «Центр-пресс», 2017. 27 с.

8. Правила русской орфографии и пунктуации. Полный академический справочник / под ред. В.В. Лопатина. М.: Эксмо, 2006. 480 с.

9. Свод правил русского правописания. Орфография. Пунктуация / под ред. О.Е. Ивановой. М.: Азбуковник, 2000. 396 с.

10. Харченко В.К. «Белые пятна» на карте современной лингвистики: книга рисков. М.: Изд-во Лит. ин-та им. А.М. Горького, 2008.

11. Колесов В.В. История русского языкознания: очерки и этюды. СПб.: Изд-во СПбУ, 2003. 471 с.


Review

For citations:


Shcherbak A.S. The hyphen as a non-traditional sign of orthography. Neophilology. 2019;5(17):42-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2019-5-17-42-48

Views: 37


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)