Development of the tradition of “zullisoinayn” in Tajik poetry of modern Uzbekistan

INTRODUCTION. In Uzbek literary criticism, the term “zullisoinayn” is used for poetry created in two languages. At one time, Alisher Navoi was a bright example of such creativity. The relevance of the study is due to its connection with the development of this literary tradition in the work of modern Uzbek poets. At present, the poetic technique of “zullisoinayn” of bilingual poets' poems makes a significant contribution to strengthening literary ties and the development of Tajik literature in modern Uzbekistan. The purpose of the study is to identify the significance of the work of Tajik poets in the development of the technique of “zullisonain” as a literary phenomenon that developed in the Middle Ages and has survived to this day, which is a symbol of literary friendship.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Using historical-descriptive, comparative and analytical methods, the specific feature of modern literary life in Uzbekistan is described. The research material was the works of famous poets, whose life and creative work are connected with modern Uzbekistan.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. An analysis of the factual material showed that the tradition of “zullisoinayn” is actively developing in the works of bilingual poets who write poems in the Persian-Tajik and Uzbek languages, especially after the Republic gained independence.

CONCLUSION. The poetic style “zullisonayn”, as an indicator of the traditions of national literature, is a symbol of the literary and cultural friendship of the Tajik and Uzbek peoples living in harmony on earth, and an indicator of the creative enrichment of both peoples, which is reflected in such phenomena of modern literature as literary bilingualism, poetic linguistic personality.

1. Sobirov E.K. Gulchin izbrannye stat’i po tadzhikskoi leksikologii, sbornik nauchnykh statei. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2021, 354 p. (In Russ.)

2. Kadymova D.R. Reflection of onomaculturological knowledge in the works of Alisher Navoi. Neofilologiya = Neophilology, 2022, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 869-874. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-4-878-883, https://elibrary.ru/jmhluo

3. Kurbonov B.Ch. On the translation of the tazkira “Majolis un-nafois” into the Dari language. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal iskusstvo slova = International Journal of Word Art, 2022, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 147-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7038251

4. Eshankulova S.I. Role of the Kokand literary environment in the development of Nadira’s creativity. Ekonomika i sotsium = Economy and Society, 2022, no. 2, pp. 1077-1082. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46566/2225-1545_2022_2_93_1077, https://elibrary.ru/npbblv

5. Orekhova E.N. Subjective modality of scientific works by L.V. Shcherba. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Russkaya filologiya = Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Russian Philology, 2021, no. 5, pp. 36-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-2021-5-36-46

6. Nasrullaeva M. Social and philosophical aspects of bilingualism based on English, Russian and Uzbek languages. Obshchestvo i innovatsii = Society and Innovation, 2022, vol. 3, no. 5/S, pp. 235-238. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss5/S-pp235-238

7. Kamitova A.V. The phenomenon of bilingualism in udmurt literature (on the example of G.E. Vereshchagin’s works). Etnicheskaya kul’tura = Ethnic Culture, 2022, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 34-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31483/r-104032, https://elibrary.ru/rncmqp

8. Mazanaev M.N. I.S. Turgenev and literary bilingualism. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Gumanitarnye nauki = Herald of Dagestan State University. Series 2. The Humanities, 2018, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 32-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21779/2542-0313-2018-33-4-32-38, https://elibrary.ru/uysmdm

9. Khukhuni G.T. Literary bilingualism: past and present. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Voprosy obrazovaniya: yazyki i spetsial’nost’ = RUDN Journal of Language Education and Translingual Practices, 2018, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 277-288. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8011-2018-15-2-277-288, https://elibrary.ru/xoirat

10. Karaulov Yu.N. Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost’. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2010, 264 p. (In Russ.)

11. Chumak-Zhun I.I. Cognitive and pragmatical features of the poetic worldview and poetic linguistic personality. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka = Cognitive Studies of Language, 2017, no. 30, pp. 661-664. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zmqivr

12. Babenko L.G., Romanova M.A. The feeling of love in the metaphorical space of the Russian language: core mappings and models. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki = Issues of Cognitive linguistics, 2024, no. 1, pp. 17-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2024-1-17-28, https://elibrary.ru/oedsid

13. Shakhovsky V.I. Language and human ecology in the changing society. Neofilologiya = Neophilology, 2020, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 217-225. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2020-6-22-217-225, https://elibrary.ru/macwou

14. Shchirova I.A. On the issue of active principles of interpretation. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka = Cognitive Studies of Language, 2023, no. 3-2 (54), pp. 811-815. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/cpjtik

15. Rasulova Z.Kh. The role and significance of the Tajik-Uzbek literary ties during the period of state independence. Vestnik tadzhikskogo natsional’nogo universiteta. Seriya filologicheskikh nauk = Bulletin of the Tajik National University. Series of Philological Sciences, 2021, no. 4, pp. 221-228. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xtsvbs