Rural anthroponyms in the shchuchin dialect of the Voronezh region

INTRODUCTION. The study is carried out in the context of the anthropocentric paradigm and is devoted to the topic of “Man”. Nickname nominations and their unique characteristics are considered. The relevance of studying the thematic group is associated with the observed processes of decreasing the number of dialect speakers, interest in the study of folk speech and the importance of registering the information available to villagers to build a certain linguistic picture. The aim of the study is to analyze unofficial anthroponyms of the small village of Shchuchye in the Liski district of the Voronezh region, reflected in the local dialect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The field material is used to study the names of village people, functioning in the sphere of informal communication in the Voronezh dialect. Experimental (survey and observation) and descriptive (description and comparison) linguistic research methods are used.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The rural nomenclature includes groups of nickname units, the classification feature of which is the method of nomination, motivational feature and the nature of the derivative base. The emergence of unofficial anthroponyms is associated with the established norms of village communication. The Shchuchin mosaic of onomastic units includes male, female and family nicknames. Male anthroponyms predominate. It is postulated that productive ways of forming names are suffixal, truncation and substantiation.

CONCLUSION. The customs of interpersonal provincial communication are quite strong. The original village nomenclature of the Shchuchintsy, depicted through folk speech combining southern Russian and Ukrainian features, is presented by 100 nickname units and represented by 21 groups. It demonstrates the original linguistic imagination of rural residents and is important not only for the dialectal anthroponymy of the 21st century, but also for Russian onomastics in general. The study may be continued by features reflecting other characteristics of unofficial names and their motivational features.

1. Ruth M.E. Anthroponyms: Reflections on Semantics. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki = Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2. Humanities and Arts, 2001, no. 20, pp. 59-64. (In Russ.)

2. Galinova N.V., Ruth M.E. From the history of the Russian surname of Deyanov / Diyanov / Dianov. Voprosy onomastiki = Problems of Onomastics, 2022, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 146-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.3.034, https://elibrary.ru/tgnhyj

3. Koroleva I.A. Onomastic spaces and field in language. Russkaya rech’ = Russian Speech, 2003, no. 2, p. 85. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oondrn

4. Shcherbak A.S. Anthropocentric principle of reflection of the picture of the world in onomastics (based on the dialects of the Tambov region). In: Gerd A.S. (executive ed.) Leksicheskii atlas russkikh narodnykh govorov (materialy i issledovaniya). St. Petersburg, 2003, pp. 54-59. (In Russ.)

5. Shcherbak A.S., Burykin A.A. To a problem of revealing of distinctive features of nicknames from a personal name. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 2009, no. 9 (77), pp. 213-217. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kzzcen

6. Suprun V.I. Onomasticheskoe pole russkogo yazyka i ego khudozhestvenno-esteticheskii potentsial. Volgograd, 2000, 172 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iqfelm

7. Madieva G.B., Suprun V.I. Anthroponyms as a means of expressing national culture. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Ivzestia of the Volgograd State PedagogicalUniversity, 2010, no. 6 (50), pp. 96-102. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mvvphd

8. Madieva G.B., Suprun V.I. General problems of onomastics. Teoriya i praktika onomasticheskikh i derivatologicheskikh issledovanii, 2017, pp. 11-51. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xyjkqx

9. Nedostupova L.V. Male village name of one dialect of the Voronezh region. Filologicheskie nauki. Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly = Philological Sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Education, 2022, no. 1, pp. 21-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.1-22.021, https://elibrary.ru/tgihwi

10. Shalatskaya K.V. Basic terminology of the study of proper names. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian Research, 2016, no. 4 (13), pp. 100-102. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xhmzit

11. Ponomarenko I.N., Bedanokova Z.K. On semantics of a proper name. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Filologiya i iskusstvovedenie = The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University, Series “Philology and the Arts”, 2018, no. 4 (227), pp. 76-82. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/arjvoa

12. Nedostupova L.V. Morphological features of the speech of a woman of the village of Shchuchye, Liskinsky district, Voronezh region. Sovremennaya russkaya leksikologiya, leksikografiya i lingvogeografiya, 2019, no. 1, pp. 197-206. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xgxhls

13. Nedostupova L.V. Features of a wedding in the village of shchuchye, Voronezh region. Sbornik materialov Vserossiiskoi s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem nauchnoi konferentsii «Rossiya narodnaya: rossyp’ yazykov, dialektov, kul’tur» = Proceedings of materials from the All-Russian scientific conference with international participation “People’s Russia: a scattering of languages, dialects, cultures”. Volgograd, 2019, pp. 130-135. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lmtblr

14. Shulunova L.V. Onomastic studies in the paradigm of modern linguistics. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University, 2011, no. 1 (48), pp. 333-337. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/luyztr