Value system as a basis for the construction of argumentation of the rhetorical genre

INTRODUCTION. The relevance of the research and its goal are formulated, which is to describe the hierarchy of values that are the basis of rhetorical argumentation and the main tool necessary to obtain the consent of the addressee. The final stage of this hierarchy is to establish the value basis of each rhetorical genre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The subject of the study is scientific and political discourses, in which the most characteristic types of values are studied at all levels, using comparative, rhetorical and content analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The concept of “value” in the meaning relevant to rhetoric is analyzed. It is established that the value system underlying rhetorical argumentation should be built separately for each type of discourse. It includes five main tiers reflecting the semantic dominants of the corresponding sphere of communication. The first level is occupied by universal values used in all spheres of communication. The second level consists of basic values reflecting the goals of the relevant sphere of public activity (institute). The third level is personal values, reflecting the required model of relations between the participants of communication, necessary for obtaining the planned result. Fourth level describes the values specific to each individual area of the relevant discourse. Finally, the fifth level is genre: here the main value, which is responsible for the unity and effectiveness of each rhetorical genre, is established.

CONCLUSION. The interrelation of all levels of the model and the role of each level in obtaining the planned result is shown.

1. Molodychenko E.N. Values and evaluation in discourse of consumerism: a pragmalinguistic analysis. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i social’nye nauki = Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanitarian and Social Sciences, 2016. no. 3, pp. 122-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2227-6564.2016.3.122, https://elibrary.ru/wkxlzd

2. Perelman Ch., Olbrehts-Tyteca L. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame. London, 1969, 566 p.

3. Karasik V.I. Linguistic and cultural diaracteristics of pedagogical discourse. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya «Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie» = MCU Journal of Philology. Theory of Linguistics. Linguistic Education, 2023, no. 2 (50), 118-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2023.50.2.10, https://elibrary.ru/czjenk

4. Serdobincev K.S. On the importance of philosophy. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Kaliningrad Branch of the Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2023, no. 2 (72), pp. 131-135. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/fgwiry

5. Kulikova E.G., Akai O.M., Tedeeva Z.K. Scientific discourse: tolerance limits (based on the material of the genre of reviews). Vestnik Rossijskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya: Chelovek v sovremennom mire = Bulletin of the Russian New University, 2021, no. 3, pp. 145-153. https://doi.org/10.25586/RNU.V925X.21.03.P.145, https://elibrary.ru/qeleqd

6. Nikiforova M.V., Chudinov A.P. Variants and representation means of “friend or foe” conceptual opposition in the individual discourse of Eu. Roizman, mayor of Yekaterinburg. Politicheskaya lingvistika = Political Linguistics, 2016, no. 4 (58), pp. 154-162. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wkygbv

7. Sowinska A., Dubrovskaya T. Discursive construction and transformation of “us” and “them” categories in the newspaper coverage on the US anti-ballistic missile system: Polish versus Russian view. Discourse & Communication, 2012, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312457521, https://elibrary.ru/rgijwh

8. Andreeva P.V. Etos postneklassicheskoj nauki. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2010, vol. 317, no. 6, pp. 164-167. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nbnlpv

9. Loskutov Yu.V. Filosofskie aspekty etosa sovremennoj nauki. Novye idei v filosofii = New Ideas in Philosophy, 2012, vol. 2, no. 20, pp. 69-77. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sayfwz

10. Serdobincev K.S. Philosophy. Methodological and prognostic possibilities of social development. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Kaliningrad Branch of the Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2020, no. 1 (59), pp. 90-93. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uamwre

11. Pishkova E.Yu. Pre-election Discourse: Pragmatics and Translation. Rostov-on-Don, Southern Federal University Publ., 2016, 120 p. https://elibrary.ru/xrjlbd

12. Homutova T.N., Naumova K.A. Military-political discourse as a distinctive type of discourse. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics, 2017, vol. 14, no 3, p. 49-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14529/ling170307, https://elibrary.ru/zezcpx

13. Shiryaeva T.A., Trius L.I., Bagiyan A.Yu., Chernousova Yu.A., Litvishko O.M. Parlamentskii Diskurs: Sociokul’turnye Praktiki i Yazykovoe Voploshchenie. Kazan, Buk Publ., 2020, 148 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/onrqgu

14. Chudinov A.P. Discoursive characteristics of political communication. Politicheskaya lingvistika = Political Linguistics, 2012, no. 2(40), pp. 53-59. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pcavqp

15. Anisimova T.V. Nekotorye principy razgranicheniya ritoricheskih zhanrov. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Yazykoznanie. = Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 2005, no. 4, pp. 54-57. https://elibrary.ru/jvkhgb

16. Danilevskaya N.V. Scientific text as dynamics assessment actions. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya = Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, 2009, no. 2, pp. 20-28. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jxrjqp

17. Chaplygin V.G. Review of the collective monograph “intellectual capital management in the knowledge economy”. Minsk: Institute of Business BSU, 2021. 139 p. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Kaliningrad Branch of the Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2021, no. 2 (64), pp. 152-153. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/cjmgfm

18. Tumaikin I.V. Riski imitacionnosti v rossijskoj nauke. Ezhegodnyj sbornik nauchnyh statej «Filosofskie problemy: vchera, segodnya, zavtra» = Annual Collection of Scientific Articles “Philosophical Problems: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow”. Rostov on Don, Rostov State University of Economics Publ., 2016, pp. 140-150. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ylwmbt

19. Khazagerov G.G. Ritoricheskii Manifest. Rostov on Don, Rostovskoi ritoricheskoi shkoly Publ., 2020, 45 p. (In Russ.)