Onomastic component of the normative-scientific macrotext “Russian language” in a dynamic aspect

INTRODUCTION. The problem of the formation of the Russian linguistic personality, in particular its onomastic component, is the subject of numerous scientific studies, covering its various aspects, including within a certain period of time. However, the previously mentioned problem has not been considered in dynamics. The purpose of the study is to characterize the onomastic space of the macrotext “Russian Language” in a dynamic aspect in the period from the 19th to the beginning of the 21st century.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research material was onyms identified in normative scientific texts of the 19th – early 21st centuries and supplemented with appellatives, which are written with a capital letter. The following methods were used: statistical, classification, comparative, et al.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The concept of the normativescientific macrotext “Russian language” is formulated, its structure and onomastic content are determined. In the normative-scientific texts of each period, the most frequent onyms are identified, forming the common core (invariant) of the onomastic space.

CONCLUSION. The study confirmed the thesis that the central place in the onomastic space belongs to anthroponyms, which in large part are among the precedent names that are of great importance in the formation of the Russian linguistic personality. This conclusion convincingly emphasizes the special role of the academic subject “Russian language” in this process. The prospects of the work are associated with the expansion of the study of systemic relations within the onomastic space, identifying the content and structure of the associative-cultural background of its key units, establishing the specifics of the functioning of proper names in the texts of textbooks on the Russian language in comparison with normative-scientific texts on other subjects, et al.

1. Kubryakova E.S. About the text and the criteria for its definition. Tekst. Struktura i semantika, 1997, vol. 1, 505 p. (In Russ.)

2. Maksimchuk N.A., Golubnichaya A.V. Onomastic space of an academic marcotext: constants and variables. Uchenye zapiski UO «VGU im. P.M. Masherova», 2018, vol. 25, pp. 148-154. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xnzsot

3. Maksimchuk N.A. Normative-Scientific Picture of Russian Linguistic Personality in a Comprehensive Linguistic Consideration in 2 pts. Smolensk, SGPU Publ., 2002, pt 1, 162 p. (In Russ.)

4. Nikolaeva T.N. The concept of “educational text” in academic discourse. Nauka i shkola = Science and School, 2024, no. 4, pp. 181-188. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2024-4-181-188, https://elibrary.ru/xkttoc

5. Boguslavsky M.V. Didactic substantiation of the formation of key skills of a person of the 21st century in a modern textbook. Sovremennyi uchebnik. Formirovanie klyuchevykh navykov cheloveka 21 veka: metodicheskoe posobie dlya avtorov uchebnikov, ekspertov, uchitelei. Moscow, 2022, pp. 15-23. (In Russ.)

6. Maksimchuk N.A. A Set of School Education Terms: Terminology vs Terminology System. Minsk, BSU Publ., 2011, pp. 87-92. (In Russ.)

7. Podolskaya N.V. Dictionary of Russian Onomastic Terminology. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978, 198 p. (In Russ.)

8. Madieva G.B., Suprun V.I. Theoretical Foundations of Onomastics. Almaty, Arys Publ., Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2011, 280 p. (In Russ.)

9. Katerina V.V. Proper names as bearers of national and cultural information. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo fede- ral’nogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki = Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, 2017, no. 4, pp. 166-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23683/1995-0640-2017-4-166-174, https://elibrary.ru/ykhtqr

10. Maksimchuk N.A. Proper name and its linguacultural potential in the structure of general obligatory knowledge. Sbornik statei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Lingvokul’turologicheskie chteniya», provedennoi v ramkakh 1 Mezhdunarodnogo lingvokul’turologicheskogo foruma «Lingvokul’turologiya i kommunikativnaya real’nost’ 21 veka: novye vyzovy – novoe osmyslenie» = Proceedings of Articles from the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Lingvoculturological Readings”, Held within the Framework of the 1st International Lingvoculturological Forum “Lingvoculturology and Communicative Reality of the 21st Century: New Challenges – New Understanding”. Moscow, 2024, pp. 308311. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/dymyqe

11. Shcherbak A.S. Thinking – onomastic sign – reality. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka = Cognitive Studies of Language, 2023, no. 3-2 (54), pp. 272-276. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/logqlm

12. Suprun V.I. Onomastic Field of the Russian Language and Its Artistic Potential. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2000, 171 p. (In Russ.)

13. Nakhimova E.A. Precedent Names in Mass Communication. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University Publ., 2007, 207 p. (In Russ.)

14. Khudaiberdina M.U., Mamonova E.Yu., Permyakova K.V. Semantics of precedent proper noun and its sense variation. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Philology. Theory & Practice, 2019, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 414-419. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.6.88, https://elibrary.ru/viltvi

15. Astafieva I.A. Precedent name in newspaper discourse. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian Research, 2022, no. 3 (36), pp. 71-75. (In Russ.) https://doi:10.36809/2309-9380-2022-36-7175, https://elibrary.ru/uzaloi

16. Shcherbak A.S. Onomastic sign-symbol in cognitive aspect. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review: Series Humanities, 2007, no. 7 (51), pp. 7-11. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iiwqqj