The place of rhetoric in the process of interdisciplinary integration of sciences

INTRODUCTION. The question of the interdisciplinary connections of rhetoric nature is raised, since the ambiguity of its status also creates difficulties in establishing its links with other humanities. In this regard, the purpose of the research is to describe the forms of interdisciplinary connections typical for the modern humanitarian studies and clarify the place of rhetoric in this system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The object of the research is the interdisciplinary connections of rhetoric with other humanitarian disciplines. For their comprehensive analysis, a set of complementary general scientific (abstraction, classification, systematization, interpretation, etc.) as well as philological (comparative analysis of the purpose of humanitarian disciplines, discourse analysis, etc.) methods are used.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The forms of interdisciplinary rhetoric are analyzed. They are divided into constructive (when independent disciplines are combined to solve issues at the junction of sciences) and destructive (when there is a mechanical unification of fragments of different sciences). The first group includes: the formation of a new science at the junction of other sciences; the unification of two equal disciplines to serve a specific field of knowledge; the interaction of science and practice; the temporary unification of independent sciences to solve some complex problem; traditional forms of enriching sciences through the use of concepts, methods, etc. of other sciences. The second group includes interdisciplinary plagiarism: substitution of the content of rhetoric with fragments borrowed from other sciences; distribution of the content of rhetoric in other disciplines; unjustified expansion of the subject of science.
CONCLUSION. The classification of interdisciplinary connections of rhetoric is generalized. The conclusion is made about its true place in the system of humanities.

1. Vernadskii V.I. Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon. In: The Philosophical Thoughts of the Naturalis. Moscow, 1988, pp. 20-209. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kbqmgg

2. Anisimova T.V. (executive ed.). Theoretical Foundations of PR Rhetoric. Volgograd, Volgograd State University Publ., 2014, 511 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/axukyi

3. Vorozhbitova A.A. Theory and practice of the lingvo-rhetorical paradigm: Sochi school. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Voprosy obrazovaniya: Yazyki i spetsial’nost = Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series of Education Issues: Languages and Speciality, 2012, no. 4, pp. 77-83. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pjovfp

4. Kurskova G.Yu., Zemskova P.E. Integrative interdisciplinarity of legal rhetoric. Sbornik statei 20 Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii «Muromtsevskie chteniya» = Collection of Articles of the 20th International Scientific Conference “Muromtsev Readings”. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 2020, pp. 54-61. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rqetip

5. Norman B.Yu., Mukhin M.Yu. Interdisciplinary trends of modern linguistics. Filologicheskii klass = Philological Class, 2021, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 33-39. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ilwgdp

6. Vorontsova Yu.A., Khoroshko E.Yu. Peculiarities of the formation of lexical competence based on professionally oriented didactic material. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Kaliningrad Branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2023, vol. 1 (71), pp. 105-110. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/djbgnq

7. Zhigunova T.S. Interdisciplinary as a key characteristic of scientific research in the tourism and hospitality industry. Gumanitarnye, sotsial’no-ehkonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Sciences, 2020, no. 7, pp. 226-227. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23672/d8368-0237-0796-y, https://elibrary.ru/rmqiad

8. Perminova L.M. Polydisciplinary and interdisciplinary in pedagogy and didactics: methodological analysis, solution ways. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Osovskie pedagogicheskie chteniya» = Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Osov Pedagogical Readings”. Saransk, 2023, pp. 529-537. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/bcrxpn

9. Anisimova T.V. The content of the rhetorical competence of a graduate of a law school. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Kaliningrad Branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2023, no. 1 (71), pp. 127-131. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/okkukq

10. Gimpelson E.G. The rhetorical genre as the basis of a specialist's communicative competence. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Pedagogika sovremennosti: doshkol’noe obrazovanie » = Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Pedagogy of the Present: Preschool Education”. Moscow, 2024, no. 2-1 (29), pp. 34-38. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nqechl

11. Mongina F.M., Govorukhina Yu.A. Learning activities planning in the process of the communicative competence forming. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Kaliningrad Branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2021, no. 2 (64), pp. 101-104. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ohyqhr

12. Prigarina N.K. The place of rhetoric in the process of forming a specialist's communicative competence. Filologicheskii Aspekt, 2024, no. S4 (27), pp. 23-29. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/huvtan

13. Osmolovskaya I.M. Methodological aspects of interdisciplinary research in education. Tsennosti i smysly = Values and Meanings, 2023, no. 4 (86), pp. 28-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6427-2023-4-28-40, https://elibrary.ru/yaeufj

14. Dedinkin A.L. Legal discourse as a multi-dimensional integrated phenomenon and legal linguistics as a syncretic science. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 2021, vol. 23, no. 1 (85), pp. 220-228. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-1-220-228, https://elibrary.ru/yilrma

15. Anisimova T.V. Modern university textbooks on rhetoric: problems, composition, text. Aktual’nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki = Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 2022, no. 4, pp. 240-251. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2022-4-240-251, https://elibrary.ru/tnfbcm

16. Malyukova O.V. The logical foundations of the legal rhetoric laws. Lex Russica (Russkii zakon) = Lex Russica, 2023, vol. 76, no. 9 (202), pp. 121-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.202.9.121-132, https://elibrary.ru/csqchd

17. Serdobintsev K.S. On the importance of philosophy. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Kaliningrad Branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2023, no. 2 (72), pp. 131-135. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/fgwiry 18. Tindale Ch.W. The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2015, 244 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316181645

18. Serdobintsev K.S. Philosophy. Methodological and prognostic possibilities of social development analysis. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Kaliningrad Branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2020, no. 1 (59), pp. 90-93. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uamwre