Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

Audience attitude to the provocative advertising: criteria for assessing communicative effectiveness

https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2020-6-21-201-212

EDN: XKBJZC

Abstract

We consider the parameters of assessing the communicative effectiveness of video advertising: mind share (study of the tonality of the audience “posts” on social networks and identification of negative/positive), engagement (audience engagement, total number of user reactions), reach (coverage). The purpose of the study is to analyze the relationship of consumer audiences to video advertising that destroy/transform stereotypical gender images. Advertising is a powerful factor in the gender socialization of an individual: it affects the consumer and through advertising images represents the modern relationship between the sexes, thereby dictating a certain model of behavior. In accordance with the above parameters, we analyze the advertising texts based on a provocative strategy to destroy gender stereotypes. The material for the study is the texts of television commercials for the last 3 years. The results are compared with indicators of the audience’s attitude to advertising messages based on stereotypical gender models. The analysis showed that advertising transforming gender stereotypes can cause a public outcry and attract much more audience attention than stereotyped advertising, while increasing indicators of not only communicative, but also economic efficiency. Thus, in the modern advertising market, any revolutionary idea is subject to monetization: social problems, in particular gender inequality, are actively exploited in the commercial sphere in order to increase effectiveness indicators. 

About the Author

M. V. Terskikh
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation

Marina V. Terskikh, Candidate of Philology,
Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics Department

55-А Ave. Mira, Omsk 644077, Russian Federation



References

1. Stepanov V.N. Provotsirovaniye v sotsial’noy i massovoy kommunikatsii [Provocation in Social and Mass Communication]. St. Petersburg, Roza mira Publ., 2008, 268 p. (In Russian).

2. Dzyaloshinskiy I., Zholud R. Provokatsiya v sisteme kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologiy [Provocation in the system of communicative technologies]. Kommunikatsii. Media. Dizayn – Communications. Media. Design, 2017, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 62-81. (In Russian).

3. Vitlitskaya E.V. Lingvisticheskaya reprezentatsiya gendernykh stereotipov v reklame: na materiale angloyazychnykh i russkoyazychnykh tekstov: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic Representation of Gender Stereotypes in Advertising: on the Material of English and Russian Language Texts. Cand. philol. sci. diss. abstr.]. Tambov, 2005, 24 p. (In Russian).

4. Krivtsova E.V. Issledovaniye gendernykh stereotipov v televizionnoy reklame muzhskogo parfyuma [Study of gender stereotypes in television advertising of men’s perfume]. Sotsial’nyye issledovaniya – Journal of Social Research, 2017, no. 1, pp. 19-38. (In Russian).

5. Khruleva T.N. Reprezentatsiya gendernykh stereotipov v zhurnal’noy reklame [Representation of gender stereotypes in magazine advertising]. Vestnik Stavropol’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Stavropol State University], 2007, no. 48, pp. 117-124. (In Russian).

6. Groshev I.V. Obraz zhenshchiny v reklame [Image of a woman in advertising]. Zhenshchina. Gender. Kul’tura [Woman. Gender Culture], 1999, pp. 331-343. (In Russian).

7. Petrov M.S. Gendernyye obrazy i stereotipy sovremennoy rossiyskoy reklamy [Gender images and stereotypes of modern Russian advertisement]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena – Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciences, 2010, no. 124, pp. 401-407. (In Russian).

8. Dudareva A. Reklamnyy obraz: muzhchina i zhenshchina [Advertising Image: Man and Woman]. Moscow, RIP-holding Publ., 2003, 222 p. (In Russian).

9. Mayorova M. 5 klyuchevykh metrik dlya analiza effektivnosti videoreklamy [5 Key Metrics for Analyzing Video Performance]. 2015, June, 25th. (In Russian). Available at: http://mfive.ru/analytics/5-klyuchevyih-metrik-dlya-analiza-effektivnosti-videoreklamyiyu (accessed 14.10.2019).

10. Barro J. Kto takaya Gillette, chtoby uchit’ menya zhizni: pochemu provalilas’ reklama o vrede maskulinnosti [Who is Gillette to Teach Me Life: Why Advertising about the Dangers of Masculinity Failed]. 2019, January, 16th. (In Russian). Available at: https://vc.ru/marketing/55620-kto-takaya-gillette-chtoby-uchit-me-nya-zhizni-pochemu-provalilas-reklama-brenda-o-vrede-maskulinnosti (accessed 14.10.2019).

11. Dru J.-M. Lomaya stereotipy [Breaking Stereotypes]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002, 272 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Terskikh M.V. Audience attitude to the provocative advertising: criteria for assessing communicative effectiveness. Neophilology. 2020;6(21):201-212. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2020-6-21-201-212. EDN: XKBJZC

Views: 13


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)