Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

The genres of documentary novel of the “Neue Sachlichkeit” and the problem of cognition

https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2019-5-20-502-509

EDN: TTXQAR

Abstract

We consider genre typology of documentary novels of “Neue Sachlichkeit”: a “report” novel, a “novel of fact” and a documentary montage novel. The proposed classification is based on the different nature of the interaction of narrative and document in these types of novels. In the “report” novel the narration is conducted from the point of view of the observer, the literary text appears as a testimony, the document of an era. The “novel of fact” is based on real documents that are partially or fully integrated into the artistic whole. In the montage novel fragments of documentary material and narrative are connected with each other associatively, resulting in a fragmentary image of the world. We analyze the novels of 1920s – early 1930s by J. Roth, A. Doeblin, E. Ottwalt, E. Reger, R. Brunngraber and E. Koeppen. We substantiate the conception, that the problem of cognition acquires special importance in the documentary-fiction novels of “Neue Sachlichkeit”. On the one hand, the hero of the novels is trying to understand the changed social reality. On the other hand, documentary-fiction novels of “Neue Sachlichkeit” require special way of reading: they are designed to activate the reader's perception, to teach the reader to recreate a complete picture of reality based on the comparison of different ways of its image: narrative, evidence and documents.

About the Author

O. A. Dronova
Derzhavin Tambov State University
Russian Federation

Olga A. Dronova, Doctor of Philology, Associate Profesor, Head of Russian as a Foreign Language Department

33 Internationalnaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian Federation



References

1. Kaspe I.M. Vmesto doveriya: «rabota s dokumentami» v russkoy literature 2000-kh [Instead of trust: «work with documents» in the Russian literature of 2000s]. Status dokumenta: okonchatel'naya bumazhka ili otchuzhdennoe svidetel'stvo [Document Status: Final Paper or Alienated Testimony]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2013, pp. 267-297. (In Russian).

2. Krylov V.N. Spory o dokumente, fakte, vymysle i plagiate v literature v nachale XX veka [Discussions about document, fact, fiction and plagiarism in the early 20th century]. Filologiya i kul'tura [Philology and Culture], 2018, no. 3 (53), рp. 162-168. (In Russian).

3. Mestergazi E.G. O termine «dokumental'naya literatura» [On the term “documentary literature”]. Vestnik Tambovskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki – Tambov University Reviews. Series: Humanities, 2007, no. 11 (55), рp. 174-177. (In Russian).

4. Shalamov V.T. Neskol'ko moikh zhizney. Proza. Poyeziya. Esse. [My Several Lives. Prose. Poetry. Essay]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1998, 479 p. (In Russian).

5. Turovskaya M.I. Na granitse iskusstv: Brekht i kino [On the Border of Arts. Brecht and Cinema]. Мoscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1984, 255 p. (In Russian).

6. Yavchunovskiy Y.I. Dokumental'nye zhanry. Obraz, zhanr, struktura proizvedeniya [Documentary Genres. Image, Genre and Structure of the Work]. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 1974, 231 p. (In Russian).

7. Döblin A. Schriften zur Ästhetik, Poetik und Literatur. Frankfurt-am-Main, Fischer Verlag, 2013, 638 p. (In German).

8. Dronova O.A. Kontseptsiya «literatury dlya ispol'zovaniya» i problema chitatel'skoy retseptsii v hudozhestvennom diskurse «novoy delovitosti» [The conception of “Gebrauchsliteratur” and the problem of the reader reception in the artistic discourse of “Neue Sachlichkeit”]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii «Kniga v sovremennom mire: problemy retseptsii» [Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Book in the Modern World: Issues of Reception”]. Voronezh, Voronezh State University Publ., 2018, рp. 89-96. (In Russian).

9. Roth J. Die Rebellion. Frühe Romane. Berlin, Weimar, Aufbau Verlag, 1984, 702 p. (In German).

10. Glaeser E. Jahrgang 1902. Göttingen, Wallstein Verlag, 2014, 390 p. (In German).

11. Reger E. Union der festen Hand. Roman einer Entwicklung. Berlin, Aragon, 1991, 677 p. (In German).

12. Heizmann J. Joseph Roth und die Ästhetik der Neuen Sachlichkeit. Heidelberg, MattesVerlag, 1990, 165 p. (In German).

13. Wilde R. Beobachtet oder gedichtet? Joseph Roths Roman „Die Flucht ohne Ende“. Neue Sachlichkeit im Roman. Neue Interpretationen zum Roman der Weimarer Republik. Stuttgart, Weimar, Metzler, 1995, pp. 27-48. (In German).

14. Junger E. Rabochiy. Gospodstvo i geshtal't. Total'naya mobilizatsiya. O boli [The Worker: Dominion and form. Total Mobilisation. On Pain]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2000, 539 p. (In Russian).

15. Brentano B. Über die Darstellung von Zuständen. In: Becker S. (ed.). Neue Sachlichkeit. Bd. 2. Quellen und Dokumente. Cologne, Weimar, Vienna, Böhlau, 2000, рp. 156-159. (In German).

16. Deblin A. Berlin – Aleksanderplac. Povest' o France Biberkopfe [Berlin – Alexanderplatz. A story of Franz Biberkopf]. Moscow, State Publ. of Artistic Literature, 1961, 535 р. (In Russian).

17. Döblin A. Berlin Alexanderplatz. Die Geschichte vom Franz Biberkopf. Munich, Deutsches Taschenbuch Verlag, 2003, 455 p. (In German).

18. Leyderman N.L. Teoriya zhanra. Issledovaniya i razbory [The Theory of the Genre. Research and Analysis]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University Publ., 2010, 904 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Dronova O.A. The genres of documentary novel of the “Neue Sachlichkeit” and the problem of cognition. Neophilology. 2019;5(20):502-509. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2019-5-20-502-509. EDN: TTXQAR

Views: 48


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)