The Revolution of 1917 and the Civil War of 1917–1922 in the historiosophical optics of M.A. Voloshin

INTRODUCTION. M.A. Voloshin’s work contains a unique depth and breadth of historiosophical reflection on the catastrophe of the first quarter of the 20th century – the Revolution of 1917 and the subsequent Civil War of 1917–1922. The purpose of the study is to analyze M.A. Voloshin’s historiosophical discourse on Russia, its distinctive features in the historical and metahistorical contexts of the tragic events of the first quarter of the 20th century.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The main research material is the poetic work of M.A. Voloshin (1917–1924), rough diary sketches, as well as journalistic articles, primarily “The Russian Abyss” (1919) and “Russia Crucified” (1920). In the course of the research, we used comparative historical and cultural historical analysis methods.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. M.A. Voloshin, using the dual optics of perception of reality (the biblical and ancient paradigms), offers the reader a complex and multilevel model of interpretation of what is happening. The poet’s understanding of revolution and internecine war is carried out through the use of biblical (Messianism, redemption, apocalypse) and ancient (symbolism, antinomianism) concepts, as well as through references to historical realities of the past.

CONCLUSION. The historiosophical system of M.A. Voloshin’s views, reflected in the poet’s work, is a unique phenomenon in the history of Russian thought. Turning to various contexts (history/meta-history), using complex concepts, the poet offers the reader his own vision of the causes of the Revolution of 1917, the Civil War of 1917–1922 and their consequences, invariably comprehending the processes of subspecie aeternitatis.

1. Dolin A.A. Russian Messianism. Prophetic, Messianic, and Eschatological motifs in Russian Poetry and Social Thought. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2023, 420 p. (In Russ.)

2. Sukhodub T.D. “New humanism” of the philosophy of history of M.A. Voloshin. Rossiya v global’nom mire = Russia in the Global World, 2017, no. 11 (34), pp. 271-281. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ynurko

3. Mel’nikov E.S. The motive of the Russian Revolution in the collection of M. Voloshin poetry “Burning Bush”. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Literaturovedenie, zhurnalistika = RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 2015, no. 2, pp. 21-28. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tuvqxz

4. Smagina E.B. The ways of the Bible: an interpretation of antique and biblical motives in the works of M.A. Voloshin. Solov’evskie issledovaniya = Solovyov’s Research, 2019, no. 4 (64), pp. 177-190. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2019.4.177-190, https://elibrary.ru/jyfnkw

5. Porol’ O.A., Prosvirkina I.I., Dmitrieva N.M. Motives of the beginning and the end in the Bible discourse of M. Voloshin. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Orenburg State University, 2014, no. 11 (172), pp. 68-72. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tnzgav

6. Stolovich L.N. Maximilian Voloshin in the context of the history of Russian philosophy (on the 130th anniversary of M.A. Voloshin’s birth). Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy, 2008, no. 3, pp. 133-146. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ipitqx

7. Yudakhin A.A. Messianic motifs in the works of the poets of the Silver age (M.A. Voloshin, A.A. Blok, S.A. Esenin). Neofilologiya = Neophilology, 2025, no. 11 (1), pp. 98-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2025-11-1-98-111, https://elibrary.ru/vizxpj

8. Loseva K.A. The title as a key factor in the interpretation of the text in M. Voloshin’s cycle “Ways of Cain. The tragedy of material culture”. Yazyk. Slovesnost’. Kul’tura = Language. Literature. Culture, 2012, no. 23, pp. 121-136. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oxgnjt

9. Yakovlev M.V. The phenomenon of Peter the Great and the Petersburg period of history in M. Voloshin’s poem “Russia”. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-tekhnologicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the State University of Humanities And Technology, 2022, no. 3, pp. 191-198. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tjzcrw

10. Obidina Yu.S. Maenadism in the Bacchantes of Euripides: historical realities in the mirror of the official cult. Vestnik Mariiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoricheskie nauki. Yuridicheskie nauki» = Vestnik of Mari State University. Chapter: History. Law, 2020, no. 1 (21), pp. 28-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30914/2411-3522-2020-6-1-28-36, https://elibrary.ru/lifahf

11. Obidina Yu.S. Space and chaos: the representativeness of the cult of Dionysus in Euripides’ tragedy “Bacchantes”. Vestnik Mariiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoricheskie nauki. Yuridicheskie nauki» = Vestnik of Mari State University. Chapter: History. Law, 2015, no. 2, pp. 19-22. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/umfsqd