Fake information markers in COVID-19 news
https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-1-173-185
Abstract
The relevance of the study is due to the interest of modern linguistics in the phenomenon of fake, the need for its comprehensive understanding and description. The aim of the work is to study the spread of fake information in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to create a classification of fake information markers based on the study of I.A. Sternin and A.M. Shesterina. For the analysis of fakes, the database “Fake News in Social Networks and Media” was created, the material was 252 Internet texts containing false statements about COVID-19 from January 2020 to February 2022. Texts were collected using a continuous sampling method, sources for collecting material served as social networks and media sites. All fragments are divided into six groups by content: “Vaccination” (32 %), “Conspiracy Theories” (20 %), “International News” (18 %), “Panic Reports and Warnings” (14 %), “Pseudo-medical advice” (9 %), “Reports of confirmed cases/deaths” (7 %). In addition, the distribution of fakes in each year is considered. In the above fragments of fakes, the following groups of typical markers of fake information were identified: Formal markers, Content markers, Lexical markers, Pragmatic markers, Information sources, Argumentation. Examples from the database are selected for each marker.
About the Author
V. V. Bitkova
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valeria V. Bitkova, laboratory researcher of the Research and Education Center “Digital Humanities”
19 Mira St., Yekaterinburg, 620002
References
1. Allcott H., Gentzkow M. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017, vol. 31 (2), pp. 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
2. Lazer D.M., Baum M.A., Benkler Y. The science of fake news. Science, 2018, vol. 359 (6380), pp. 10941096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
3. Tandoc Jr. E.C., Lim Z.W., Ling R. Defining “Fake News”. Digital Journalism, 2018, vol. 6 (2), pp. 137153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
4. Tandoc Jr. E.C., Thomas R.J., Bishop L. What is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories. Media and Communication, 2021, vol. 9 (1), pp. 110-119. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331
5. Vosoughi S., Roy D., Aral S. The Spread of True and False News Online. Science, 2018, vol. 359 (6380), pp. 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
6. Egelhofer J.L., Lecheler S. Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 2019, vol. 43 (2), pp. 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
7. Karasik V.I. Factoids as a linguocultural phenomenon. Politicheskaya lingvistika = Political Linguistics, 2017, no. 3 (63), pp. 21-30. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zdmbfx
8. Zuikina K.L., Sokolova D.V. Content specifics of Russian fake news on the internet and on television. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10: Zhurnalistika [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 10: Journalism], 2019, no. 4, pp. 3-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.4.2019.322, https://elibrary.ru/xccerj
9. Molina M.D., Sundar S.S., Le D. “Fake News” Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content. American Behavioral Scientist, 2021, vol. 65 (2), pp. 180-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878224
10. Bakir V., McStay A. Fake news and the economy of emotions. Digital Journalism, 2018, vol. 6 (2), pp. 154175. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
11. Martel C., Pennycook G., Rand D.G. Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, 2020, vol. 5 (1), p. 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
12. Heath C. Do People Prefer to Pass along Good or Bad News? Valence and Relevance of News as Predictors of Transmission Propensity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996, vol. 68 (2), pp. 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0091
13. Vorderer P., Klimmt C., Ritterfeld U. Enjoyment: At the Heart of Media Entertainment. Communication Theory, 2004, vol. 14 (4), pp. 388-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00321.x
14. Duffy A., Tandoc E., Ling R. Too Good to Be True, Too Good Not to Share: The Social Utility of Fake News. Information, Communication & Society, 2019, vol. 23 (13), pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1623904
15. Bright J. The Social News Gap: How News Reading and News Sharing Diverge. Journal of Communication, 2016, vol. 66 (3), pp. 343-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12232
16. Marwick A.E. Why Do People Share Fake News? A Sociotechnical Model of Media Effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2018, vol. 2 (474), pp. 474-512. Available at: https://georgetownlaw-techreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2.2-Marwick-pp-474-512.pdf
17. Sukhodolov A.P., Bychkova A.M. Fake news as a modern media phenomenon: definition, types, role of fake news and ways of taking measures against it. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki = Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism, 2017, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 143-169. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17150/23086203.2017.6(2).143-169, https://elibrary.ru/xsetyb
18. Arkhipova A.S., Radchenko D.A., Kozlova I.V., Peigin B.S., Gavrilova M.V., Petrov N.V. Specifics of infodemic in Russia: from WhatsApp to the Investigative Committee. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2020, no. 6 (160), pp. 231-265. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1778, https://elibrary.ru/gwigpr
19. Sternin I.A., Shesterina A.M. Markery feika v mediatekstakh [Markers of fake in media texts]. Voronezh: LLC “Publisher RITM”, 2021, 60 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.vsu.ru/ru/university/structure/communicate/pdf/monographs/markers2.pdf
20. Panchenko N.N. Feik-novost' v aspekte dostovernosti [Fake news in terms of reliability]. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty izucheniya rechevoi deyatel'nosti = Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Studying Speech Activity, 2013, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 164-169. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qcdasf
21. Brennen J.S., Simon F.M., Nielsen R.K. Beyond (Mis)Representation: Visuals in COVID-19 Misinformation. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 2021, vol. 6 (1), pp. 277-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220964780
Review
For citations:
Bitkova V.V. Fake information markers in COVID-19 news. Neophilology. 2023;9(1):173-185. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-1-173-185
Views:
51
Email this article 