Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

Andrei Platonov’s writing method: selected key characteristics and linguostylistic means

https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-28-565-577

Abstract

Andrei Platonov’s writing method in its ideological and theoretical basis is considered by us as the ontological relationship of his personality and creative perspective with spiritual values, attitudes and philosophical views which he professes. This writing method is realized in Platonov’s prose through the artistic interaction of author’s philosophical concepts and linguistic means which form his idiostyle. The main and broader goal of our research is a systematized and classifying description of the key language models and techniques most typical of Platonov’s writing method. The scientific results of our comprehensive analysis of Platonov’s idiostyle testify to our assertion that most of the elements and features of Platonov’s “deformed” and “coded” language are artistically modeled and are an example of the author’s successful stylization. Due to the peculiarities of the author’s language and style, Platonov’s literary text is distinguished by rich semantic ambivalence and implicativity. The volume of our work does not allow us to present a more detailed presentation of the provisions of Andrei Platonov’s creative method and an allencompassing analysis of the most important linguostylistic means which make up it. In this we, we set our specific task within the framework of a brief analytical review of the individual characteristics of Platonov’s writing method and a selective linguostylistic analysis of the key and most effective means and techniques of linguistic expressiveness which form this unique author’s method, to clearly demonstrate some of its fundamental principles and approaches.

About the Author

V. V. Bouilov
University of Eastern Finland
Finland

Vassili V. Bouilov, Doctor of Philosophy, Senior Lecturer of Russian Language and Translation Department Humanities Division Faculty of Philosophy

2 Yliopistokatu, Joensuu 80100



References

1. Shklovskiy V.B. Iskusstvo kak priyem. «Poetika». Sborniki po teorii poeticheskogo yazyka (I–II). Sbornik II [Art as a Device. “Poetics”. Collections on the Theory of Poetic Language (I–II). Collection II]. Petrograd, 18th State Typography, 1919. (In Russian). Available at: http://imwerden.de/pdf/poetika_vyp_1_i_2_1919.pdf (accessed 10.06.2021).

2. Elistratov V.S. O strukture prozy A. Platonova (pis’mennyy tekst i ego zvukovoye ispolneniye) [On the structure of A. Platonov’s prose (written text and its sound performance)]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya 9: Filologiya – Moscow University Philology Bulletin. Series 9, 1989, no. 2, pp. 68-74. (In Russian).

3. Gershenzon M.O. Izbrannoye [Selected]. Moscow, Universitetskaya Kniga Publ.; Jerusalem, Gesharim Publ., 2000, vol. 1, pp. 5-37. (In Russian).

4. Platonov A.P. Pushkin – nash tovarishch [Pushkin is our comrade]. Literaturnyy kritik – Literary Critic, 1937, no. 1. (In Russian).

5. Barsht K.A. Poetika prozy Andreya Platonova [Poetics of Andrei Platonov’s Prose]. St. Petersburg, Faculty of Philology SPbU Publ., 2005, 480 p. (In Russian).

6. Tolstaya-Segal E.M. Stikhiynyye sily: Platonov i Pil’nyak. (1928–1929) [Elemental Forces: Platonov and Pilnyak. (1928–1929)]. Slavica Hierosolymitana. Vol. 3 / Sbornik slavistiki universiteta Iyerusalima. T. 3 [Slavica Hierosolymitana. Vol. 3 / Collection of Slavic Studies of the University of Jerusalem. Vol. 3]. Jerusalem, The Magnes Press, 1978, pp. 89-109. (In Russian).

7. Buylov V.V. Andrey Platonov i yazyk ego epokhi [Andrei Platonov and the language of his era]. Russkaya slovesnost’ [Russian Literature], 1997, no. 3, May–June, pp. 30-35. (In Russian).

8. Platonov A.P. Kotlovan [The Foundation Pit]. Moscow, Book Chamber Publ., 1988, 318 p. (In Russian).

9. Buylov V.V. Izmeneniye semantiki i valentnosti slov v kontekste prozy Andreya Platonova [Changes in the semantics and valence of words in the context of Andrei Platonov’s prose]. Voprosy funktsionirovaniya sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Questions of the Functioning of the Modern Russian Language]. Moscow, Pushkin State Russian Language Institute Publ., 1996, pp. 60-66. (In Russian).

10. Mukhin A.M. Valentnost’ i sochetayemost’ glagolov [Valence and compatibility of verbs]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya – Linguistic Issues, 1987, no. 6, pp. 52-64. (In Russian).

11. Ozhegov S.I. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, Russian Language Publ., 1990, 917 p. (In Russian).

12. Morkovkin V.V. Sochetayemostnyye svoystva slova i problema ikh sistemnoy leksikograficheskoy intepretatsii [Combinable properties of a word and the problem of their systemic lexicographic interpretation]. Problemy sochetayemosti slov. Vyp. 145 [Word Collocation Problems. Issue 145]. Moscow, M. Thorez MSPIFL Publ., 1979, pp. 129-140. (In Russian).

13. Selishchev A.M. Revolyutsiya i yazyk. Vyrazitel’nost’ i obraznost’ yazyka revolyutsionnoy epokhi. Izbrannyye trudy [Revolution and Language. Expressiveness and Imagery of the Language of the Revolutionary Era. Selected Works]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1968, pp. 141-158. (In Russian).

14. Valgina N.S. Teoriya teksta [Text Theory]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 1997, 278 p. (In Russian).

15. Shmelev D.N. Problemy semanticheskogo analiza leksiki [Problems of Semantic Vocabulary Analysis]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973, 280 p. (In Russian).

16. Yartseva V.N. (ed.-in-chief). Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopedia Publ., 1990, 682 p. (In Russian).

17. Golub I.B. Stilistika sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. Leksika. Fonika [The Stylistics of the Modern Russian Language. Vocabulary. Phonica]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1976, 208 p. (In Russian).

18. Lopatin V.V., Lopatina L.E. Malyy tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Small Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, Russian Language Publ., 1990, 704 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Bouilov V.V. Andrei Platonov’s writing method: selected key characteristics and linguostylistic means. Neophilology. 2021;7(28):565-577. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-28-565-577

Views: 73


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)