On the finale of Y.I. Zamyatin’s novel “We”: an optimistic tragedy?
https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-28-684-693
Abstract
We consider the ambiguity of Y.I. Zamyatin’s novel ending “We” on the basis of its synthetic feature and the author’s worldview ideas embodied in it. We note the key function of the heroine I-330 in the structure and novel theme, we draw attention to another female character, O90, whose fate is a seemingly “secondary”, completed earlier, but no less important storyline of the novel. We analyze O-90’s intertextual connections with other characters, at the plot level; we also reveal some possible extratextual associations of this character with Zamyatin’s statements in his critical articles and essays. Thus, in this character we see a fairly clear “integral image” of motherhood and writing, a realization of the “spiral” path of dialectical development, which is important for Zamyatin’s writer identity, and a hint of the vitality of the seemingly failed revolution as well. The combination of these features in one character makes us rethink the plotline of the novel and allows us to see a certain optimistic implication in its tragic ending. The symmetry of the two heroines’ fate and their decisive alliance also prove the importance of this character in the composition and the subject matter of the work.
About the Author
Hongyuan Wang
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Hongyuan Wang, Post-Graduate Student, History of Russian Literature Department
7-9 Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg 199034
References
1. Zamyatin Y.I. Sobraniye sochineniy: v 5 t. [Collected Works: in 5 vols.]. Moscow, Russkaya kniga Publ., Republik Publ., Dmitriy Sechin Publ., 2003–2011. (In Russian).
2. Koltsova N.Z. «Sintetizm» E. Zamyatina i sinkreticheskiye tendentsii v russkoy literature pervoy treti XX v. [E. Zamyatin’s “Synthetism” and the syncretic tendencies in Russian literature of the first third of the 20 century]. Vestnik BGU – The Bryansk State University Herald, 2016, no. 2, pp. 161-167. (In Russian).
3. Lyubimova M.Y. Filosofskiye vzglyady i kul’turologicheskiye vozzreniya E. Zamyatina [Philosophical and cultural views of E. Zamyatin]. E.I. Zamyatin: pro et contra [E.I. Zamyatin: For and Against]. St. Petersburg, RCAH Publ., 2014, pp. 207-264. (In Russian).
4. Khatyamova M.A. Kontseptsiya sintetizma E.I. Zamyatina [E.I. Zamyatin’s concept of Syntheticism]. Vestnik TGPU – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2005, no. 6, pp. 38-45. (In Russian).
5. Robustova V.V. Kognitivno-funktsional’nyye osobennosti onomastikona romana E.I. Zamyatina «My» [Cognitive and Functional Features of the Onomasticon of E.I. Zamyatin's novel “We”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya – The Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 19. Linguistics and Cross-Cultural Communication. 2016, no. 3, pp. 82-95. (In Russian).
6. Gredel V.P. Kontsept «nauka i iskusstvo» v khudozhestvenno-diskursionnom pole kommunikativnosintaksicheskoy struktury romana E.I. Zamyatina «My» [A ‘science and art’ concept in artistic-discursive field of communicative-syntactical structure of E.I. Zamyatin’s “We” novel]. Neofilologiya – Neophilology, 2018, no. 14, pp. 44-53. https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2018-4-14-44-53. (In Russian).
7. Ilyenko S.G., Gredel V.P. Kommunikativno-sintaksicheskiy aspekt analiza romana E.I. Zamyatina «My» v svete sovremennykh tendentsiy rusistiki [Communicative-syntactical aspect of Zamyatin’s “We” analysis in the light of modern Russian studies]. Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena – Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2017, no. 186, pp. 5-12. (In Russian).
8. Stepanova A.A. Apollonicheskoye/dionisiyskoye kak faustovskaya antinomiya v romane Evgeniya Zamyatina «My» [Apollonian/dionysian as Faustian antinomy in Y. Zamyatin’s novel “We”]. Ural’skiy filologicheskiy vestnik. Seriya: Russkaya literatura XX–XXI vekov: napravleniya i techeniya – Ural Philological Herald. Series Russian Literature of XX–XXI Centures: Directions and Trends, 2016, no. 3, pp. 181-191. (In Russian).
9. Andreyeva S.L. «Prezhde oruzhiya – my ispytyvayem slovo». Tekstovyye markery neogranichennoy lzhi i ogranichennoy pravdy v gosudarstvennoy gazete (po stranitsam romana E. Zamyatina «My») [“Before Weapons, We Test the Word.” Text Markers of Unlimited Lies and Limited Truth in the State Newspaper (From the Pages of E. Zamyatin's Novel “We”)]. Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury – Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies, 2016, no. 3 (53), pp. 57-65. (In Russian).
10. Dolgina E.S. Problema formirovaniya lichnosti v ramkakh totalitarnogo gosudarstva na primere antiutopicheskogo proyekta «My» E.I. Zamyatina [Personality’s formation problem in the frames of totalitarian state. On the example of anti-utopian project “We” by E.I. Zamyatin]. Diskussiya – Discussion, 2016, no. 10 (73), pp. 116-122. (In Russian).
11. Khatyamova M.A. Iskusstvo kak dolzhnoye v romane E. Zamyatina «My» [Art for granted in E. Zamyatin’s novel “We”]. Russkaya literatura v XX veke: imena, problemy, kul’turnyy dialog. Vyp. 8 [Russian Literature in the 20th Century: Names, Problems, Cultural Dialogue. Issue 8]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2006, pp. 7-26. (In Russian).
12. Morson G. Granitsy zhanra [Genre boundaries]. Utopiya i utopicheskoy myshleniye [Utopia and Utopian Thinking]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1991, pp. 233-251. (In Russian).
13. Khatyamova M.A. Metatekstovaya struktura romana E. Zamyatina «My» [The metatext structure of E. Zamyatin’s novel “We”]. E.I. Zamyatin: pro et contra [E.I. Zamyatin: For and Against]. St. Petersburg, RCAH Publ., 2014, pp. 500-518. (In Russian).
14. Sukhikh I.N. Utopiya i vera vechnogo eretika (1920. «My» E. Zamyatina) [Utopia and faith of the eternal heretic (1920. “We” by E. Zamyatin)]. Russkiy kanon: Knigi XX veka [The Russian Canon: Books of the 20th Century]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 2019, pp. 83-112. (In Russian).
15. Davydova T.T. «My» E. Zamyatina – roman-antiutopiya [E. Zamyatin’s “We” – a dystopian novel]. E.I. Zamyatin: pro et contra [E.I. Zamyatin: For and Against]. St. Petersburg, RCAH Publ., 2014, pp. 380403. (In Russian).
16. Forster E.M. Aspects of the Novel. NewYork, Harcourt, Inc. Publ., 1985, 176 p.
17. Shaytanov I.O. Anatomiya utopii: roman «My» v tvorchestve i sud’be E. Zamyatina [The anatomy of utopia: the novel “We” in the work and fate of E. Zamyatin]. E.I. Zamyatin: pro et contra [E.I. Zamyatin: For and Against]. St. Petersburg, RCAH Publ., 2014, pp. 341-379. (In Russian).
18. Zhenett Z. Figury: v 2 t. [Figures: in 2 vol.]. Moscow, Sabashnikov Publ., 1998, vol. 2, 471 p. (In Russian).
19. Booth W.C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Second Edition. Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press, 1983, 572 p.
20. Tumanov V. Mary Versus Eve: Paternal Uncertainty and the Christian View of Women. Neophilologus, 2011, no. 4, pp. 507-521.
21. Tang H. Feminist Literary Theory. Taipei, Yangzhi Culture, 2003, 328 p. (In Chinese).
22. Iglton T. Teoriya literatury: Vvedeniye [Literary Theory: Introduction]. Moscow, “Territory of the future” Publishing House, 2010, 296 p. (In Russian).
23. Lanin B., McMillin A. Images of Women in Russian Anti-Utopian Literature. The Slavonic and East European Review, 1993, no. 4, pp. 646-655.
Review
For citations:
Wang H. On the finale of Y.I. Zamyatin’s novel “We”: an optimistic tragedy? Neophilology. 2021;7(28):684-693. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-28-684-693
Views:
59
Email this article 