Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

Architectonics as a way of studying painting (on the example of M. Vrubel’s work)

https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-3-642-651

Abstract

The main purpose of study is the issue of studying the work of painting with the help of architectonics. The definition of this term is given in a broad sense, which allows us to apply it not only to the study of architectural objects, but also gives us the opportunity to apply it to the fine arts, and also allows us to consider a painting at a higher quality level, taking into account many factors that contribute to its holistic perception, which is relevant today. We use semiotic method, which allows us to address such a fact as the perception of a work of art and the creation of one’s own artistic image. Analysis of some works by M.A. Vrubel allows us to draw a conclusion about his originality of thinking and the creative method used by the artist, with the help of which he tried to convey his vision to a wide audience. All these points that are touched upon: colour, composition, space, all this is a reflection of the artist’s inner intense work, his attempt to rethink reality, himself, in order to be able to explain this to “readers”. Such an approach allows not only to study the artist’s work, but also to consider the features of his perception of space, which in turn can be used in teaching humanitarian subjects, and will also attract a wider range of scientists dealing with the same kind of problem, and will continue the discussion. in this direction.

About the Author

T. M. Nikolskaya
Derzhavin Tambov State University
Russian Federation

Tatyana M. Nikolskaya, Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Cultural Studies and Social Cultural Projects Department

33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000



References

1. Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Y. Tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, Mir i obrazovanie Publ., 2014, 1376 p. (In Russian).

2. Nikolskaya T.M. Ispol’zovaniye printsipov semioticheskogo analiza dlya izucheniya proizvedeniy zhivopisi v vuze (na primere tvorchestva E. Munka) [The use of principles of semiotics analysis to study the paintings in the university (basing on the example of E. Munch’s work)]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki – Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 2017, vol. 22, no. 6 (170), pp. 85-93. https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2017-22-6(170)-85-93. (In Russian).

3. Dmitriyeva N.A. Mikhail Vrubel’: Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo [Mikhail Vrubel: Life and Work]. Moscow, Detskaya Literatura Publ., 1988, 140 p. (In Russian).

4. Popova L.V. Demonicheskoye v tvorchestve M.A. Vrubelya [The “Demonic” IN M.A. Vrubel’s oeuvre]. Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye – Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2013, no. 4, pp. 278-282. (In Russian).

5. Kogan D.Z. M.A. Vrubel’ [M.A. Vrubel]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1980, 350 p. (In Russian).

6. Norenkov S.V., Krasheninnikova E.S. Arkhitektonicheskoye iskusstvo: kul’tura proyektnogo tvorchestva [Architectonic Art: the Culture of Design Creativity]. Nizhny Novgorod, Printing Center of NNGASU, 2019, 294 p. (In Russian).

7. Benua A. Vrubel’ (Rech’. № 91. 3 aprelya 1910 g.) [Vrubel (Speech. No. 91. April 3, 1910)]. In: Benua A.N. Khudozhestvennyye pis’ma. 1908–1917. Gazeta «Rech’». T. 1. 1908–1910 [Artistic Letters. 1908– 1917. Newspaper “Speech”. Vol. 1. 1908–1910]. St. Petersburg, 2006. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Nikolskaya T.M. Architectonics as a way of studying painting (on the example of M. Vrubel’s work). Neophilology. 2022;8(3):642-651. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-3-642-651

Views: 41


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)