Representation of the Samarkand text in the linguocognitive aspect
https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2024-10-1-67-75
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The relevance of the study of the Samarkand text is due to the development of many issues related to the development of text theory and linguocognitive tradition in linguistics: the Samarkand text allows, on one toponym Samarkand, to identify a system of cognitive contexts, or conceptual thematic areas that underlie the formation of various meanings and senses that reflect information about certain facts and phenomena of reality associated with the toponym Samarkand. The purpose of the study is to establish the relationship of the toponym Samarkand with conceptual areas based on the identified characteristics and determine the status of the toponym as a special type of linguistic organization of knowledge.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research material is poems in which the toponym Samarkand is presented. The collection of toponymic material is carried out using the continuous sampling method. The cognitive matrix method is used to describe the formats of toponymic knowledge.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. Turning to the format of the cognitive matrix made it possible to show how universal human knowledge about the structure of the surrounding reality behind the toponymic unit Samarkand is formatted.
CONCLUSION. The status of the toponym Samarkand as a special type of linguistic organization of knowledge is determined, the role of the prevailing conceptual and thematic areas that form the content of the Samarkand text is revealed.
About the Author
Y. V. Lipatova
Samarkand State University named after Sh. Rashidov
Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan
Yevgeniya V. Lipatova - Lecturer of Russian Language Department.
15 University Blvd, Samarkand, 140100
References
1. Kartavenko V. The Toponymical Continuum as a Text. W kręgu zagadnień semantyki i stylistyki tekstu. Łódź, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2014, s. 55-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-416-7.06
2. Gorbanevskii M.V. Russkaya gorodskaya toponimiya: Metody istoriko-kul’turnogo izucheniya i sozdaniya komp’yuternykh slovarei [Russian Urban Toponymy: Methods of Historical and Cultural Study and Creation of Computer Dictionaries]. Moscow, Society of Russian Literature Lovers Publ., 1996, 304 p. (In Russ.)
3. Berezovich E.L. Toponimicheskoe prostranstvo kak tekst [Toponymic space as text]. Ezhegodnik Nauchnoissledovatel’skogo instituta russkoi kul’tury [Yearbook of the Research Institute of Russian Culture]. Yekaterinburg, UrFU Publ., 1995, pp. 86-95. (In Russ.)
4. Boldyrev N.N. Conceptual basis of language. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. IV. Kontseptualizatsiya mira v yazyke = Cognitive Studies of Language. Issue 4. Conceptualization of the World in Language, Moscow, Tambov, 2009, pp. 25-78. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pnontp
5. Chirkova N.V. An image of the town in the context of representation of historical and cultural memory: heritage and modernity [Review of the book by Anatoly I. Ionesov and Vladimir I. Ionesov. “Samarkand: An Image of the Town in the Space of Intercultural Communication. An Encyclopedia of Foreign Samarkandiana”. Tashkent, SMI-ASIA, 2022. 852 P.]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2023, no. 4 (474), pp. 119-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2023-474-4-119-123, https://elibrary.ru/lcaflw
6. Martynenko I.A. Hispanic place names through the prism of critical and political toponymy. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya [Izvestiya of RAS. Series: Geography], 2021, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 763-772. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S258755662105006X, https://elibrary.ru/gfkcgn
7. Sharandin A.L. Nauchnyi kommentarii kak format znanii [Scientific Commentary as a Knowledge Format]. Moscow, FLINTA Publ., 2023, 396 p.
8. Golomidova M.V. Urban toponymy as a means of manifesting regional identity: the case of Ufa city. Voprosy onomastiki = Problems of Onomastics, 2022, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 160-179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.1.008, https://elibrary.ru/iiwctg
9. Shcherbak A.S. Onomastic categories: correlation of language and cognitive structures. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki = Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2012, no. 4 (33), pp. 78-83. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pculxn
10. Zolyan S.T. Semantics of linguistic sign in the light of the asymmetrical dualism theory: possible extensions. Voprosy yazykoznaniya = Topics on the Study of Language, 2023, no. 1, pp. 151-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658X.2023.1.151-168, https://elibrary.ru/mihoxe
11. Kovlakas E.F. On the study of toponyms in cognitive aspect. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem = Modern Studies of Social Issues, 2021, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 326-354. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-4-326-354, https://elibrary.ru/ldyxms
12. Toporov V.N. Peterburgskii tekst russkoi literatury: Izbrannye trudy [Petersburg Text of Russian Literature: Selected Works]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo Publ., 2003, 616 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vnjoij
13. Martynenko I.A. On the introduction of the term “cognitive toponymy”. Tomskii zhurnal lingvisticheskikh i antropologicheskikh issledovanii = Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 2020, no. 3 (29), pp. 142-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6119-2020-3-142-150, https://elibrary.ru/kmqipp
14. Shurupova O.S. Kontseptosfera peterburgskogo i moskovskogo tekstov russkoi literatury (sopostavitel’nyi analiz): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Conceptosphere of Saint-Petersburg and Moscow Texts of Russian Literature (Comparative Analysis). PhD (Philology) diss. abstr.]. Yelets, 2011, 24 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zoeuqp
15. Shurupova O.S. Moskovskii tekst russkoi literatury i ego geroi [Moscow text of Russian literature and its heroes]. Russkaya rech’ = Russian Speech, 2011, no. 1, pp. 98-102. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ndeown
16. Yarantsev V.N. Chitat’ Peterburg: gorod kak tekst [Read Petersburg: the city as a text]. Evraziiskii nauchnyi zhurnal [Eurasian Scientific Journal], 2016, no. 10, pp. 302-309. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wzzusj
17. Shcherbak A.S. Thinking – onomastic sign – reality. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. 3. Ch. II. Kognitsiya, kommunikatsiya, diskurs: sovremennye aspekty issledovaniya = Cognitive Studies of Language. Issue 3. Pt 2. Cognition, communication, discourse: modern aspects of research, Tambov, 2023, pp. 272-276. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/logqlm
18. Boldyrev N.N., Alpatov V.V. A cognitive-matrix analysis of English Christian place-names. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki = Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2008, no. 4, pp. 5-14. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/juuoor
19. Shcherbak A.S., Konchakova S.V., Razduev A.V. Model’ matritsy nominatsii urbanonimov [Model of the nomination matrix of urbanonyms]. Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta = Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University Bulletin, 2016, no. 2, pp. 33-37. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wkfkex
20. Ionesova A.I., Ionesova V.I. Samarkand: Obraz goroda v prostranstve mezhkul’turnoi kommunikatsii. Ehntsiklopediya zarubezhnoi Samarkandiany [Samarkand: The Image of the City in the Space of Intercultural Communication. Encyclopedia of Foreign Samarkandiana]. Tashkent, SMI-ASIA Publ., 2022, 852 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Lipatova Y.V. Representation of the Samarkand text in the linguocognitive aspect. Neophilology. 2024;10(1):67-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2024-10-1-67-75
Views:
97
Email this article 