Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

ON THE ISSUE OF EVALUATION FUNCTION ONTOLOGY OF HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS

https://doi.org/ 10.20310/2587-6953-2018-4-14-18-24

Abstract

Evaluation is considered as the ontological characteristics of a person. The relevance of research is due to the increased scientists’ interest in the study of the category of evaluation. Evaluation is one of the most important linguistic categories and is recognized as the main way to reflect the value system of a person in the language. Evaluation is considered as a universal category of a text. We analyze the types of the evaluation category: emotional, intellectual, emotional and intellectual. Evaluation is a specific systemic affective-cognitive, evaluative-self-evaluating mental category that performs an important function of human consciousness, regulating the behavior and activities of the individual. The main characteristics of human evaluating activity are considered by a complex research method. Prototypes of adaptive behavior of the individual are analyzed. The influence of adaptive stimuli on emotional and behavioral reactions based on the activity approach is substantiated. The functions of evaluative statements are presented. The identification of evaluative component in lexical units is carried out on the basis of “good” or “bad” semes, since the positive or negative meaning of these semes is beyond doubt. Evaluation can be expressed in denotative and connotative meanings; it also may appear occasionally, i. e. under the influence of context or background knowledge. Due to the context, lexical units that do not have any evaluative semantic features can become such words and change the sign to the opposite depending on the situation, and these judgments are always anthropocentric.

About the Author

Tatyana Vladimirovna Zhmaylo
Pavlodar State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Марков Б.В. Философия. СПб.: Питер, 2011. 432 с.

2. Бряник Н.В. Общие проблемы философии науки. Словарь для аспирантов и соискателей / сост. и общ. ред. Н.В. Бряник; отв. ред. О.Н. Дьячкова. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2007. 318 с.

3. Morano D.V. Existential Guilt. BV-Assen: Van Yoram & Co, 1973. 125 р.

4. Изард К. Психология эмоций. СПб.: Питер, 1999. 464 с.

5. Сидорина Т.Ю. Философия кризиса. М.: Флинта: Наука, 2003. 456 с.

6. Иванова Г.Ф. Ментальные сферы языка: оценка. Уфа: Изд-во БГПУ, 2007. 124 с.

7. Телия В.Н. Коннотативный аспект семантики номинативных единиц. М., 1986. 144 с.

8. Болдырев Н.Н. Когнитивные схемы языковой интерпретации // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2016. № 4. С. 10-20.

9. Арутюнова Н.Д. Язык и мир человека. М.: Язык русской культуры, 1999. 896 с.

10. Loevinger J. Measurement of personality. True or false // Psychological Inquiry. 2009. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 1-16.


Review

For citations:


Zhmaylo T.V. ON THE ISSUE OF EVALUATION FUNCTION ONTOLOGY OF HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS. Neophilology. 2018;4(14):18-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/ 10.20310/2587-6953-2018-4-14-18-24

Views: 22


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)