Lexicographic portrait of the word destiny: theory and practice of text communication

INTRODUCTION. At the present stage of the development of national culture, much attention is paid to words that define the linguistic and philosophical aspects of the Russian linguistic worldview. The concept of destiny is included in the system of these ideas, that as part of the study and further analysis of the definitions of dictionaries of various types, a system of word-formation, combinability, associative and etymological possibilities of the word destiny has been determined. On this basis, the properties of this lexeme are described, which are elusive outside the framework of the integral description. The purpose of the study is to establish the features of the modern understanding of the Russian lexeme destiny and the creation of its lexicographic portrait.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research material is data from dictionaries of various types. During the analysis, it is necessary to take into account the principles and techniques of the descriptive method, comparison; analysis of linguistic, scientific and educational literature, generalization and elements of the statistical method of illustration.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The lexicographic portrait of the word destiny is compiled.
CONCLUSION. It is established that the development of meaningful, grammatical and other resources of the word destiny is driven by national and culturological perceptions of Russian people. Consequently, it is possible to establish ethnocultural connotations that are represented by a specific lexeme and its derivates in the process of lexicographic portraying.

1. Sazhenin I.I. Corpus Methods in Lexicography: the Experience of the Dictionary Corpus Model. Cand. Sci. (Philology) diss. abst. Novosibirsk, 2013, 23 p. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/zpcrdh

2. Karasik V.I. Self-expression in different types of discourse. Kommunikativnye issledovaniya = Communication Studies, 2022, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 564-574. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ftxeqd

3. Vorob’eva T.A., Kharaponova O.V. Lexicographic portrait of the word “Motherland”. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 3 ch. T. 1. Literaturovedenie, lingvistika, SMI, istoriya, filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya «Cherepovetskie nauchnye chteniya – 2015» = Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference: in 3 parts. Volume 1. Literary studies, linguistics, media, history, philosophy, sociology, political science “Cherepovets Scientific Readings – 2015”. Cherepovets, Cherepovets State University, 2016, pp. 41-43. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/wbjtdf

4. Riabkova E.S. Semantic – syntactic units of the text. The Scientific Heritage, 2022, no. 84, pp. 55-57. https://doi.org/10.24412/9215-0365-2022-84-4-55-57, https://elibrary.ru/lzahzk

5. Tugusheva A.V., Piskunova S.V. Classification of text units with the semantics of references in Russian language system. Neofilologiya = Neophilology, 2021, vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 384-392. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-27-384-392, https://www.elibrary.ru/cxooyw

6. Voronina L.V. Text units with purpose semantics in a discursive perspective. Neofilologiya = Neophilology, 2024, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 812-820. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2024-10-4-812-820, https://www.elibrary.ru/gwwmwq

7. Shvetsova V.M. Principles of semantic development of holographic units in the semantic space of a literary text. Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University, 2010, pp. 123-127. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/mtzxff

8. Ustyantseva E.V. Linguocultural portrait of the word “Bread”. Russkii yazyk = Russian Language, 2008, no. 14, pp. 9-19. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/bwyxfp

9. Apresyan Yu.D. Main principles and concepts of systematic lexicography. Yazykovaya kartina mira i sistemnaya leksikografiya = Language Worldview and Systematic Lexicography. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur Publ, 2006, pp. 33-74. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pwasxb

10. Klyushina A.M. Lexicographical representation of the word “extreme”. Mir nauki. Sotsiologiya, filologiya, kul’turologiya = The World of Science. Sociology, Philology, Cultural Studies, 2020, vol. 11, no. 4, art. 37. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/llhoxq

11. Nemich N.N. Lexicographic description of synonymous constituents in the field of inexpressible semantics. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki = Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, 2022, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 34-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18522/1995-0640-2022-2-34-46, https://www.elibrary.ru/dnshig

12. Mikhailova M.Yu. The Semantics of the Unspeakable in Language and Speech. Moscow, FLINTA Publ., 2020, 244 p. (In Russ.)