Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

Strategies for building a professional reputation of Russian emigres and self-educated writers

https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2020-6-23-512-520

EDN: VYJFTI

Abstract

We analyze the ways of constructing a writer's reputation in exceptional cultural conditions related to displacement of entire generations of authors to the literary process periphery and their lack of a “right to creative work”. We compare the experience of two conditionally distinguished large and heterogeneous groups – writers from the people who tried to declare themselves at the beginning of the 20th century as an independent current, and representatives of the Russian literary emigration. In addition to a number of common features (falling into the “blind zone” of generally recognized literature, internal isolation, leading to the fact that the majority of readers belong to the same environment as writer, the lack of economic benefits from publishing works), self-educated writers and emigres resorted to similar strategies for building a reputation. We find that representatives of both groups formulated a noble mission uniting them, aimed at serving national literature, turned to the experience and poetics of predecessor writers to construct their own literary tradition, legitimizing their special creative path, and tried to structure their sub-field by creating associations and circles , as well as critical reflection of the current literary process.

About the Authors

Yu. V. Kaminskaya
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Yuliya V. Kaminskaya, Post-Graduate Student, Lecturer of Journalism and Literary Studies Department of Philology and Language Communication Institute

79 Svobodny Ave., Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russian Federation



O. A. Tolstonozhenko
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Oxana A. Tolstonozhenko, Senior Lecturer of Journalism and Literary Studies Department of Philology and Language Communication Institute

79 Svobodny Ave., Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russian Federation



References

1. Tikhanov G. Russkaya emigrantskaya literaturnaya kritika i teoriya mezhdu dvumya mirovymi voynami [Russian Émigré literary criticism and theory between the World Wars]. Istoriya russkoy literaturnoy kritiki: sovetskaya i postsovetskaya epokhi [History of Russian Literary Criticism: Soviet and Post-Soviet Era]. Moscow, New Literary Observer Publishing House, 2011, pp. 335-367. (In Russian).

2. Shevelenko I. Modernizm kak arkhaizm. Natsionalizm i poiski modernistskoy estetiki v Rossii [Modernism as Archaism. Nationalism and the Search for Modernist Aesthetics in Russia]. Moscow, New Literary Observer Publishing House, 2017, 336 p. (In Russian).

3. Agafonova Y. Klassika dlya naroda v adaptatsiyakh Postoyannoy komissii po ustroystvu narodnykh chteniy [Classics for common people in adaptations by the standing committee on the organization of reading for the people]. Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye – New Literary Observer Publishing House, 2019, no. 2, pp. 77-93. (In Russian).

4. Kalinin I. Ugnetennyye dolzhny govorit’: massovyy prizyv v literaturu i formirovaniye sovetskogo sub”yekta, 1920-e – nachalo 1930-kh godov [The oppressed must say: mass appeal to literature and the formation of the Soviet subject, 1920s – early 1930s]. Tam, vnutri. Praktiki vnutrenney kolonizatsii v kul’turnoy istorii Rossii [There, Inside. The Practice of Internal Colonization in the Cultural History of Russia]. Moscow, New Literary Observer Publishing House, 2012, pp. 587-663. (In Russian).

5. Kosmach T. Nashim sud’yam [To our judges]. Priboi [Swash], Moscow, Narodny kruzhok Publ., 1905, pp. 13-14. (In Russian).

6. Goryachaya S.V. Smenovekhovtsy 20–30-kh godov: otsenka bol’shevistskogo opyta reformirovaniya Rossii: avtoref. dis. … kand. ist. nauk: 07.00.02 [Smenekhovets of the 20–30s: an Assessment of the Bolshevik experience of Reforming Russia. Cand. ist. sci. diss. abstr.: 07.00.02]. Rostov-on-Don, 2004. (In Russian).

7. Bunin I.A. Missiya russkoy emigratsii [Mission of Russian emigration]. Rul’ [Rudder], 1924, no. 1013,pp. 5-6. (In Russian).

8. Tolstonozhenko O.A. K voprosu o konstruirovanii professional’noy identichnosti pisateley-samouchek v nachale XX veka [Towards the invention of professional identity of early 20th century autodidact writers]. Letnyaya shkola po russkoy literature – Summer School on Russian Literature, 2019, no. 2-3, pp. 207-220. (In Russian).

9. Chagin A.I. Perekrestok [Crossroads]. Literaturnaya entsiklopediya russkogo zarubezh’ya (1918–1940). T. 2. Ch. 2 [Literary Encyclopedia of Russian Abroad (1918–1940). Vol. 2. Part 2]. Moscow, Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 1997, pp. 181-183. (In Russian).

10. Khodasevich V.F. Po povodu «Perekrëstka» [About “Crossroad”]. Vozrozhdeniye – Renaissance, 1930, no. 1864, pp. 3-4. (In Russian).

11. Zlobin V.A., Terapiano Y.K., Engelgardt L.N. Ot redaktsii [From the editors]. Novyy korabl’ – New Ship. Paris, 1927, no. 1, p. 4. (In Russian).

12. Nalegach N.V. Anna Akhmatova i «Parizhskaya nota»: k voprosu o poeticheskom vliyanii [Anna Akhmatova and the Paris note: on the issue of poetic influence]. Izvestiya UrFU. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnyye nauki – Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2: Humanities and Arts, 2019, vol. 21, no. 3 (190), pp. 24-35. (In Russian).

13. Terapiano Y.K. O novykh knigakh stikhov [About new poetry books]. Krug. Kn. 2 [Circle. Book the 2nd]. Berlin, Parabola Publ, 1937, pp. 160-173. (In Russian).

14. Korostelev O.A. «Parizhskaya nota» i protivostoyaniye molodezhnykh poeticheskikh shkol russkoy literaturnoy emigratsii [“Paris note” and the confrontation of youth poetry schools of Russian literary emigration]. Literaturovedcheskiy zhurnal – Literary Journal, 2008, no. 22, pp. 3-50. (In Russian).

15. Chukovskiy K.I. Anna Akhmatova [Anna Akhmatova]. In: Chukovskiy K.I. Sobraniye sochineniy: v 15 t. T. 5 [Collected Edition: in 15 Vols.]. Moscow, FTM Agency Ltd., 2013, vol. 5, pp. 195-229. (In Russian).

16. Melnikov N.G. Klassik bez retushi. Literaturnyy mir o tvorchestve Vladimira Nabokova: kriticheskiye otzyvy, stat’i, parodii [Classic without Retouching. The Literary World about Work of Vladimir Nabokov: Critical Reviews, Articles, Parodies]. Moscow, New Literary Observer Publishing House, 2000, 688 p. (In Russian).

17. Yanovskiy V.S. Polya eliseyskiye: kniga pamyati [Elysian Fields: Memory Book]. Moscow, Berlin, Direct-Media Publ., 2016. 335 p. (In Russian).

18. Odoyevtseva I.V. Na beregakh Seny [On the Banks of the Seine]. Moscow, Berlin, Direct-Media Publ., 2016, 163 p. (In Russian).

19. Shruba M. Literaturnyye ob”yedineniya Moskvy i Peterburga 1890–1917 godov: Slovar’ [Literary Associations of Moscow and St. Petersburg 1890–1917: Dictionary]. Moscow, New Literary Observer Publishing House, 2004. (In Russian).

20. Shar Y. Literator [Literator]. Probuzhdeniye: Literaturno-khudozhestvennyy al’manakh pisateley iz naroda. Kn. pervaya [Awakening: Literary and Artistic Almanac of Writers from the People. Book One]. Suzdal, 1912, pp. 37-38. (In Russian).

21. Kaspe I. Iskusstvo otsutstvovat’: Nezamechennoye pokoleniye russkoy literatury [The Art of Being Absent: An Unnoticed Generation of Russian Literature]. Moscow, New Literary Observer Publishing House, 2005. (In Russian).

22. Bem A.L. Issledovaniya. Pis’ma o literature [Researches. Letters about Literature]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2001, 451 p. (In Russian).

23. Khodasevich V.F. Podzemnyye rodniki [Underground springs]. Novyy korabl’ – New Ship, 1927, no. 2, pp. 25-28. (In Russian).

24. Khodasevich V.F. O sovetskoy literature [About Soviet literature]. In: Khodasevich V.F. Sobraniye sochineniy: v 4 t. T. 2. Zapisnaya knizhka. Stat’i o russkoy poezii. Literaturnaya kritika 1922–1939 [Collected Works: in 4 Vols. Vol. 2. Notebook. Articles about Russian Poetry. Literary Criticism 1922–1939]. Moscow, Soglasiye Publ., 1996, pp. 419-425. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Kaminskaya Yu.V., Tolstonozhenko O.A. Strategies for building a professional reputation of Russian emigres and self-educated writers. Neophilology. 2020;6(23):512-520. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2020-6-23-512-520. EDN: VYJFTI

Views: 7


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)