General and private evaluation of interpersonal relationships in the indus-trial field (on the material of English language)
Abstract
It is devoted to the problem of evaluative categorization of interpersonal relationships in the industrial field in the English language. The relevance is in cognitive-linguistic orientation, studying of the principles and mechanisms of evaluative categorization. The aim is to determine the features of general and private evaluation of industrial interpersonal relationships. The evaluation is formed at the intersection of the objective and evaluative characteristics of the assessed object, that is why they are identified and presented. For this purpose, special literature is analyzed, as well as reference books and dictionaries. The selection of these features allows to show the most significant landmarks in the evaluation activities of the subject of evaluation. The frame structure of interpersonal relations in the industrial field is described. English language means of representation of evaluative category of industrial interpersonal relationships are systematized. The cognitive mechanisms underlying the evaluative categorization of the studied type of relationship are revealed. The level organization of evaluative categorization of interpersonal relationships in the industrial sector is presented. In the case of general evaluation, evaluating subject turns to the constitutive objective characteristics of interpersonal relationships, and in the case of private evaluation – to the variable characteristics of interpersonal relationships.
About the Author
Anait Norikovna KHUDANYAN
Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Post-graduate Student, Foreign Philology and Linguistics Department
Tambov, Russian Federation
References
1. Sotsiologicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar': na russkom, angliyskom, nemetskom, frantsuzskom i cheshskom yazykakh / obshch. red. G.V. Osipova. M., 1998.
2. Macmillan Dictionary online. URL: http://www. macmillandictionary.com (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2015).
3. Boldyrev N.N. Struktura i printsipy formirovaniya otsenochnykh kategoriy // S lyubo-v'yu k yazyku: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Posvyashchaetsya E.S. Kubryakovoy. Moskva; Voronezh, 2002. S. 103-114.
4. Boldyrev N.N. Kognitivnaya semantika. Vvedenie v kognitivnuyu lingvistiku. Tambov, 2014.
5. Arutyunova N.D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka. M., 1999.
6. Minskiy M. Freymy dlya predstavleniya znaniy. M., 1979.
7. Fillmor Ch. Freymy i semantika ponimaniya // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. M., 1988. Vyp. 23. S. 52-92.
8. Fillmore Ch.J. Frame semantics // Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from the
9. SICOL-1981. Seoul, 1982. P. 111-137.
10. Batarshev A.I., Luk'yanov O.A. Psikhologiya upravleniya personalom. M., 2005.
11. Klement'ev D.S. Sotsiologiya i psikhologiya upravleniya: monografiya. M., 2004.
12. Armstrong M. Praktika upravleniya chelovecheskimi resursami. SPb., 2004.
13. Mel'nikov O.N., Larionov V.G. Rukovoditel' i podchinennyy // Rossiyskoe predprinimatel'stvo. 2001. № 11 (23). C. 52-59.
14. Tompson A.A., Striklend A.Dzh. Strategicheskiy menedzhment. Iskusstvo razrabotki i realizatsii strategii / per. s angl.; pod red. L.G. Zaytseva, M.I. Sokolovoy. M., 1998.
15. Paniotto V.P. Struktura mezhlichnostnykh otnosheniy: metodika i matematicheskie metody issledovaniya. K., 1975.
16. Shibutani T. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. M., 1969.
17. Basakov M.I. Spravochnik kadrovika. M., 2010.
18. Cambridge International Dictionary of English. Cambridge, 1996.
19. Longman Dictionary of English Language and Culture. Harlow, 1992.
20. Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English / ed. by A.S. Hornby. Oxford, 1995.
21. Collins Cobuild English Dictionary for Ad-vanced Learners / ed. by J.M. Sinclair. Glasgow, 2001.
22. Employment Relationships. From Beginning to End. URL: http://www.dol.govt.nz/ (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2015).
23. Corpus of Contemporary American English. URL: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2015).
24. Millar A., Holloway J., Henderson P. Becoming an encouraging supervisor: the encouraging supervisory relationship // Private Practice. 2014. P. 27-29.
25. Lockett B. Beyond the Dictionary. M., 1998.
26. British National Corpus. URL: http://corpus.byu. edu/bnc (data obrashcheniya: 15.10.2015).
Review
For citations:
KHUDANYAN A.N. General and private evaluation of interpersonal relationships in the indus-trial field (on the material of English language). Neophilology. 2015;1(3):33-38. (In Russ.)
Views:
2
Email this article 