Preview

Neophilology

Advanced search

Variation of phraseological sentences as a reflection of their dual grammatical nature

Abstract

It is devoted to the problem of phraseology in syntax, not studied enough yet. The notion of phraseology in linguistics is perceived first of all as connected with lexical structure of language. But in syntax constructions this phenomenon is presented widely and figuratively. One type of syntax phraseological units are the sentences of phraseological structure (PS). Their basic essential grammatical peculiarities are considered. PS are build up according to phraseological model, which includes: constant, fixed components, that means reserved words in their secondary use, defining their composition and phraseological meaning and free, variable component, which is lexically free, due to this there can be build many utterances on one model. Compare: Тоже мне город; Тоже мне праздник; Тоже мне помощник (That’s not a city; That’s not festival; That’s not an assistant). Thus, PS have dual nature, combine features of phraseological units and features of sentence. Basic part is devoted to variation of PS. This aspect of analysis is not chosen accidentally: variation is a characteristic feature of PS and that is what they are different from lexical phraselogical units. The variation of building is not a characteristic feature for them. The aim is to analyze the reason of PS variation and to reveal the ways of its appearance. It is shown, that variation is the confirmation and appearance of their grammatical essence, their dual nature. Some variants of PS reflect their phraseological nature, others are conditioned by their syntactic features. The variants of first type are conditioned on the word of constant type is replaced by another, both lexically and grammatically wasted (Какой / Какое / Где / Куда там прочитал! (But that won’t do to read!)). The variants of the second type are conditioned on by sentence features of FS, but grammatical features of free component define the form of constant, compare: Какой это певец, Какой он певец, Какая это певица, Какая она певица: (What a singer, She / He is not a singer) but only: Какой это праздник (What a festival). Variations of FS do not conflict with phraseological nature of FS as it is realized within strict frames of their stability and repeatability.

About the Author

Alla Vasilyevna VELICHKO
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor

Moscow, Russian Federation



References

1. Bondarenko V.T. Ustoychivye frazy v russkoy rechi: monografiya. Tula, 2011.

2. Piotrovskaya L.A. Emotivnye vyskazyvaniya kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya. SPb., 1994.

3. Kodukhov V.I. Sintaksicheskaya frazeologizatsiya // Problemy frazeologii i zadachi ee prepodavaniya v vysshey i sredney shkole. Vologda, 1967.

4. Matevosyan L.B. Statsionarnoe predlozhenie: ot standartnogo k original'nomu. Moskva; Erevan, 2005.

5. Melikyan V.Yu. Ocherki po sintaksisu nechlenimykh predlozheniy. Rostov n/D, 2001.

6. Shmelev D.N. Ekspressivno-ironicheskoe vyrazhenie otritsaniya i otritsatel'noy otsenki v sovremennom russkom yazyke // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1958. № 6. S. 63-75.

7. Shmelev D.N. O “svyazannykh” sintaksicheskikh konstruktsiyakh v russkom yazyke // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1960. № 5. S. 47-60.

8. Salmina L.M. Vremennye frazeologizkhirovannye struktury s komponentom ne // Sintaksicheskie semanticheskie otnosheniya v slozhnom predlozhenii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Kalinin, 1985. S. 18-27.

9. Fast L.V. Standartizovannye predlozheniya v razgovornykh i dramaturgicheskikh tekstakh: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. M., 1993.

10. Russkaya grammatika: v 2 t. / gl. red. N.Yu. Shvedova. M., 1980. T 2.

11. Velichko A.V. Predlozheniya frazeologizirovannoy struktury v russkom yazyke: strukturno-grammaticheskaya i semanticheskaya kharakteristika // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 9. Filologiya. 2012. № 4. S. 7-24.

12. Grammatika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka / pod red. N.Yu. Shvedovoy. M., 1970.

13. Shvedova N.Yu. Ocherki po sintaksisu russkoy razgovornoy rechi. M., 1960.

14. Arkhangel'skiy V.L. Problemy ustoychivosti frazeologicheskikh edinits i ikh znakovye svoystva // Problemy ustoychivosti i variativnosti frazeologicheskikh edinits: materialy mezhvuzovskogo simpoziuma. Tula, 1968. S. 21-29.

15. Zhukov V.P. Semantika frazeologicheskikh oborotov. M., 1978.

16. Nikolaeva T.M. Funktsii chastits v vyskazyvanii. Na materiale slavyanskikh yazykov / otv. red. V.N. Toporov. M., 2005.


Review

For citations:


VELICHKO A.V. Variation of phraseological sentences as a reflection of their dual grammatical nature. Neophilology. 2015;1(4):5-11. (In Russ.)

Views: 9


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-6953 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5868 (Online)